My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
02-09-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:27:59 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 12:32:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? • <br />I .ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24,2003 <br />8. M03-2951 Judith and James Pierpontt 1849 and 1801 West Fann Road—Lot <br />Line Rearrangement-Continued <br />police those conditions. <br />McMillan stated the only way to enforce the appropriate use of the guesthouse, is to <br />require the removal the kitchen. <br />White sUted he would like to see standards for historical residences, and also a definition <br />of a kitchen. <br />Mrs. Pierpont staled they installed a cooktop to help prepare simple food items for <br />children. Otherwise guests dine at the main house. <br />Gaffiron stated that the applicants wanted to move the lot line 3/lOths of an acre, creating a <br />2-acre and a 4-acre lot. Rededicating easement is not an issue. They would still have two <br />buildable sites with sewer coining in to both sites. <br />Mrs. Pierpont stated they want to redefine the lot line because they have the chance to <br />bring in sewer to two lots, defraying the cost of sewer for the nei^bors and making it <br />more feasible for the City to bring sewer. Also, their son suggested they divide lot 14 so <br />that they ’d have the option of selling it off someday if they wanted to. They also own a <br />house on 6* Avenue North, which their son lives in. If someday the property passes to <br />him, he would have the option of selling off lot 14. <br />Gaffron stated that as it currently stands, lot 14 is a separate tax parcel from lot 15. Both <br />lots abut a private road. The only reason to move the lot line, could be because the septic <br />system for lot 15 crosses the property line. With sewer coming, lot 14 could remain at 2.2 <br />acres. <br />Barrett stated the Pierponts currently h;»ve two lots, so there is no real need to change it. <br />They would then be left \\ith a nonconforming guesthouse on a lot with under 4-acres of <br />dry buildable. If the kitchen were removed, that problem would be solved and they could <br />leave the lots as is. <br />Gaf&on staled that the typical kitchen conuins a sink, stove and refrigerator. The <br />Planning Commission was not concerned with the Pierponts use of the house, but there is <br />a risk that the next owner could use it as a permanent residence. <br />Murphy stated that there ought to be a bener way to insure the future use of the <br />guesthouse than to punish the Pierponts for wanting to leave things as they ’ve been for the <br />last decade. <br />McMillan stated that the lots were supposed to be combined in 1990, before the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.