My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
02-09-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:27:59 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 12:32:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, January 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth asked whether the applicant found the subdivision necessary if they planned <br />to hook up to City sewer when available. <br />Pierpont stated that they are trying to correct a flaw in the property and make a second stand alone <br />parcel. <br />While the sink as it exists was small, Gaffiron questioned the Commission whether they felt the <br />covenants would limit its use. <br />Pierpont stated that he was willing to sign any covenants. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth did not believe the small sink enclosed in the antique piece should have to <br />go. <br />Fritzler disagreed, suting that he felt a cook top and sink constituted a kitchen in his mind and <br />would have to go. <br />Rah concurred with Fritzler, ^ting that the concept allows a bathroom facility but stops short of a <br />kitchen facility. <br />Gaffron suggested this be revisited in the code at a future date, as the original intent of the code <br />was to allow a bathroom facility in the garage. <br />While she believed the sink housed in the piece of furniture was lovely, Bremer was concerned that <br />the Commission has denied similar requests in the past and could not allow this request <br />Pierpont reiterated that the only thing that has changed over time is the law. He maintained that he <br />had not changed a thing to his property and been given ai^ovals from the original construction <br />decades ago, as well as, as recently as 1990, and now they are being told they need to remove this <br />amenity. He again repeated that plumbing had always been a part of the stable and merely <br />upgraded over the years, just as the wetland has always been a part of the property. He felt this <br />should be a non-issue, since his guest house was approved 14 years ago in a previous application. <br />PAGE 47 of 64 <br />' r <br />i t <br />; i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.