My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
01-12-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 12:38:26 PM
Creation date
1/19/2023 12:27:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, DECEMBER 8,2003 <br />5. 2004 Levy AJaptioH Hearing—AioptUm of 2004 Budget and Tax Levy-Continued <br />A. Adopt Final 2003 Levy Collectible In 2004—Resolution No. 5086 <br />Murphy moved, and Snasevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5086 adopting the <br />Final 2003 Tax Levy Collectible in 2004. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />B. Adopt 2004 General Fund Budget —Resolution No. 5087 <br />White moved, and McMillan seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5087 adopting the <br />2004 General Fund Budget <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />C. Adopt the 2004 Special Revenue Funds Budgets —Resolution No. 5088 <br />Mayor Peterson moved, and Murphy seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5088 <br />adopting the 2004 Special Revenue Funds Budgets. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PARK COMMISSION COM.MENTS—DREW MCDERMOTT, <br />REPRESENTATIVE <br />McDermott stated that no one had been found to run the Dakota Rail as a train service, so <br />they were abandoning the project and hopefully turning it into a recreation trail. He noted <br />that Mound and Spring Park were passing resolutions in support of the trail, and Moorse <br />had commented in the newspaper in favor of the trail. He hoped Orono would also pass a <br />resolution. <br />He stated the Parks Commission did not have a December meeting, so there was no new <br />business. <br />White asked if it was necessary to pass another resolution in favor of the trail when they <br />had already passed several in the past. Moorse replied it would be helpful to reiterate their <br />position in support of the recreation trail. <br />Murphy stated that the trail issue had gone on so long, that many parties had changed on <br />city councils and the county board, so he agreed that it was necessary to re-state their <br />position. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.