Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, DECEMBER 8,2003 <br />*7. #03*2866A David & Judy Zoschke, 2040 Shad>*wood Road—Appeal of <br />Administrative Decision—Final Action <br />Sansevere moved, and White seconded, that in the appeal by Judy and David*^' <br />Zoschke, #03>2866A^ the City* Council hereby confirms the findings and cpdclusions <br />\of the Planning Commission as noted In the staff memo to Council datcci December <br />4,2003. '\ <br />Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*8. ^03>2943 Robert & JanefLabalt, 3202 North Shore Drive—^Variance (Revised <br />Proposal)—Resom^n No. 5090 ,/ <br />Sansevere moved, and White secono^to adopt R^olution No. 5090 granting <br />variances to Orono Municpal Zoning <^e Sec^tfons 78<330(B), 78-282, and 78- <br />1288(B) in order to construct an attachctUi^ under garage with 2 stories of living <br />space above on the walk-out side of the h^^ attached to the existing one story walk* <br />out home. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*9. 1103-2951 Judith and Jan^ Pierpont, 1849 andsl801 West Farm Road—^Lot <br />Line Rearrangement—Resoiutions N(^091 & 5092 <br />Sansevere moved, amHVhite seconded, to adopt Resoluti^No. 5091, approving a <br />Subdivision of a LpIXine Rearrangement for Properties Loh^ted at 1801 and 1849 <br />West Farm Ro^#03-2951. <br />Vote; Ayes 5yNays 0. <br />Sanseveye moved, and White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5092^npproving the <br />Vacathm of a Dedicated Drainage & Utility Easement Within Lots 14 &^, Block 1, <br />Th^arm at Long Lake, #03-2951. <br />Vdte;_Ayei5,^'aiys,0.r*,.— <br />10. #03-2961 Nina Wildman, 745 Spring Hiii Road—Preliminary Subdivision <br />Gaffron stated that the application was for preliminary’ plat approval. The 24-acre <br />property was set back from Spring Hill Road and gained access through two other <br />properties. The property was being subdivided into 3 lots, with the existing house on lot <br />I, the driveway with a loop, tennis court, and guesthouse. The applicant proposed <br />building a new house on lot 2. and leaving lot 3 as a buildable lot. All lots met the <br />standards for the zone as buildable lots with septic. <br />The Planning Commission felt the subdivision was reasonable, but had issues w’ith the <br />access. Lot 3 would require a width variance where it abuts a private road. A small <br />portion of the driveway loop would require a hardcover variance where it comes within