My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-2004 Council Work Session
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
06-08-2004 Council Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 12:23:31 PM
Creation date
1/19/2023 12:19:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2484 . Woodhill CC <br />May 5. 1999 <br />Page 11 <br />Drainage and Erosion Impacts <br />Portions of the proposed gravel driveway have a relatively steep grade and therefore <br />are subject to possible erosion. The easterly portion of the driveway, primarily that <br />portion within the Club property, could be directed to drain to an existing depression <br />north of the driveway. The existing drainage pattern generally is eastward toward <br />Woodhill Avenue, discharging under the private portion of Woodhill Avenue through <br />an existing culvert. The rates and volumes of stormwater runoff generated by this <br />access driveway do not warrant a NURP pond nor other extensive stormwater <br />management facilities. Improvements of the ditches adjacent to the driveway will be <br />needed to ensure no stormwater impacts to the driving surface of Woodhill Avenue. <br />A paved driveway W'ould be less susceptible to erosion and sedimentation. Because <br />this is a business driveway, all portions of the driveway in the right-of-way are <br />required to be paved with bituminous material per Section 6.05 Subd. I OB. It <br />is staffs understanding that the Club has proposed a gravel driveway rather tlian <br />pavement for a number of reasons, ineluding visual impact, traffic speed reduction, <br />to create a public perception that it is a driveway rather than a road. etc. 1 lowever. <br />paving would decrease the potential for sedimentation; would ne a quieter driving <br />surface; and would result in avoiding the maintenance concerns of maintaining a <br />clean transition area between the gravel and pa\ ed surfaces, i.c. avoiding loose gra\ el <br />on the paved surface at an intersection, which can cause noise problems, loss of <br />traction, etc. <br />F. Other Potential Neighborhood Impacts <br />I. Dust . The propo.sed gravel driveway will have a potential to create a dust <br />problem during periods of dr> weather. Limiting the traffic speed to 10 mph as <br />proposed will help to limit the dust to a great extent. Periodic watering or calcium <br />chloride treatments could also be used. Any dust problem would be eliminated by <br />paving the access driveway. <br />2. Noise. ITic additional traffic generated by this access wall have little noise <br />impact on the neighK>rhcH>d. Tlie gravel surface w ill likely generate more tire noise <br />than would a bituminous paved surface. Vegetation that had grown up in and around <br />the old roadl>cd prior to its 1998 reconstruction may have provided some small degree <br />of noise buffering to the neighborhood from the maintcnace facility. That buffer will <br />no longer be in place; however, no homes appear to be directly alTected by this loss <br />of vegetation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.