My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-2004 Council Work Session
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
06-08-2004 Council Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 12:23:31 PM
Creation date
1/19/2023 12:19:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2484 - Woodhill CC <br />May 5, 1999 <br />Page 9 <br />4.Resulted in the Club's granting an access easement in favor of Lot 3, Woodhill <br />Ridge (the lot which is not served by the private road) over Club property to <br />Woodhill Avenue in the event the Co. Rd. 15 access is blocked. <br />1988 Maintenance Building CUP. In 1988 Woodhill applied for and was issued <br />variances and a CUP for a new maintenance building to be located approximately <br />160' east of the Woodhill Ridge subdivision, and adjacent to the old driveway <br />connecting to Woodhill Avenue. A portion of the old driveway bed was filled near <br />the northwest comer of the maintenance building, in conjunction with the site grading <br />for that building. The CUP/variance resolution does not address future use of the <br />driveway connection to Woodhill Avenue. The only reference in the Planning <br />Commission and Council minutes as to use of the old driveway was a negative <br />response from the Club's sur\'eyor to Jeanne Mabusth's question whether the <br />Woodhill Avenue connection would have to be opened during maintenance building <br />construction. <br />During the 1988 review process the concerns of the neighborhood were addressed, <br />resulting in a relocation of the original proposed building site (north side of old <br />driveway, 50' from west lot line) to the final location 160 ’ from the west lot line and <br />on the south side of the old driveway. This placed it approximately 350’ from the <br />actual house sites of each of the two nearest residential lots, and allowed for the <br />saving of several trees, a screening barrier to the surrounding residential properties. <br />The review process also resulted in a CUP approval condition that future complaints <br />from adjacent residents about increased noise from the maintenance operation would <br />allow the City to re-open the CUP for further review. <br />C. Why is a Secondary Access Needed? For Whom? When? <br />The Club was advised to define the concerns that have resulted in this request. The <br />Club addresses this topic on pages 6-8 of Exhibit I (PLEASE READ!). In brief, the <br />following topics are addressed: <br />Increased traffic volume and speed on Co. Rd. 15 <br />Temporar)' problems during Co. Rd. 15 improvements construction <br />Expected greater volumes and speeds on Co. Rd. 15 once the <br />improvements are completed <br />- Raised elevation of Co. Rd. 15 <br />- Left turns difficult and dangerous for member access from west <br />Potential to reduce access to 15, making 15 safer <br />- No other access points available to Club without acquisition <br />- Other potential access locations which might be acquired/deveioped <br />would have greater impacts on other neighborhoods. <br />;1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.