My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
06-15-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 11:28:31 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 11:04:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- > <br />mnr ^1.^4.?? <br />*;.cv4i1^52 <br />i” i»-^' <br />I^;v <br />Zoning File #1738 <br />June 11, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />A-1 - Orono School District Letter <br />B-1-2 Notice/Map Sent to Adjacent Property Owners <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />H <br />I <br />F'’ lap:':'' i <br />?■ y^' <br />Property Owners List <br />Notification Map . . ^ <br />Memo on Meeting with Orono Staffs School District <br />Personnel and Athletic Association <br />Park Commission Minutes 6/2/92 <br />Hennepin DOT Letter 4/27/92 <br />Gaffron Memo 5/29/92 <br />Oman Memo 6/10/92 <br />J - Gustafson Report 6/10/92 <br />K Plat of Orono School Expansion <br />L - Developer's Agreement for Orono School Expansion Plat <br />M - Easement Agreement <br />N - Conceptual Site Development Plan for Orono School <br />District 10/1/90 , <br />O - Packet of Exhibits and Information Prepared & Submitted <br />by Del Erickson, Architect for Applicant. (Please <br />refer to this packet for elevations, site plan, site <br />topography, review of alternate sites, and cost <br />analysis.) <br />mm.•A.--, <br />Review of Sketch Plan Application <br />t- <br />* <br />• ' ‘ij <br />The applicants were advised to apply under a sketch plan <br />review as part of the comprehensive proposal Involves a future <br />subdivision. A major issue for both applicant and City is the <br />issue of proposed use and the fact that the use is not <br />specifically listed under the specific conditional use permit <br />section but references other similar uses. The City is asked to <br />consider the ice hockey arena as a similar use to those listed as <br />permitted via the conditional u^e permit. In the late 1980's, <br />the City completed a comprehensive plan of the Highway 12 area. <br />This property was specifically approved for single family <br />residential use. The property had been included within the MUSA <br />boundary line and with Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2, the <br />eastern portion of the property bounded by Willow Drive was <br />to be included within the MUSA. The saturated soils will <br />necessitate sewer as septic use is not feasible. <br />If <br />■ r <br />John Shardlow, the consultant planner for the City, has <br />been asked to review proposed use in relation to the ordinance <br />section under consideration. As of this writing, staff has heard <br />nothing but will report at your meeting. <br />mm <br />.A <br />1 <br />* <br />■idiUteU
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.