Laserfiche WebLink
•V- <br />Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members <br />Mayor Peterson and City Council <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Subjects <br />Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator <br />June 9, 1992 <br />2110 Sugarwood Drive - Request to Realign Entrance Drive <br />y4< J >' <br />List of Exhibits <br />A ~ Applicant's Addendum <br />B - Gustafson's Report Dated 6/5/92 <br />C - Site Plan Approved with Building Permit <br />D - Hardcover Proposed with Building Permit <br />IpE - Hardcover Proposed with Driveway Realignment <br />P - Realigned Driveway Proposal <br />G - Topographic Mapping of Sugarwoods Plat <br />Description of Request <br />■ <br />^ I <br />I <br />Applicant seeks to vary from standards adopted at the time of the <br />conditional use permit approval for the planned residential <br />development of Sugarwoods. Resolution #2652 required "each lot to be <br />served by a single driveway or one curb cut at a 20' maximum allowed <br />width. Driveway width is to be measured parallel to the loop road, <br />Sugarwood Drive. The portion of the drive located within the front <br />street setback shall be placed in a straight alignment from the loop <br />road and shall not exceed a width of 20' within the front street <br />setback area." <br />'•i- <br />At the time of the issuance of the building permit, the issue of <br />a realigned drive was discussed and applicant was advised of the need <br />to apply for special permission of the City for any change to the <br />standards approved for the Sugarwoods plat. The applicant also noted <br />.^^‘^that the house was planned for the fail parade of homes and that it <br />was imperative for a building permit to be issued as soon as possible. <br />The building staff was advised that the only way a building permit <br />could be issued was for the applicant to provide a site plan that met <br />the standards of the PRD. Staff accepted the site plan with the <br />building permit (Exhibit C). Unfo-.ru-auely, during this review staff <br />noted that the proposed paved drive exceeds the 20' alJowed width <br />through the 50* street setback. If applicant does not receive <br />approval of the realigned drive, it will be necessary for the <br />applicant to realign the portion of the drive that exceeds the 20' <br />required width. <br />■if <br />& <br />i <br />Please review Exhibit A. - Mr. Bonner has reviewed many of the <br />physical conditions unique to the property suggesting a need for <br />special consideration. Staff has also enclosed the original <br />topographic map done for the Sugarwoods plat. Exhibit G, note the <br />severe drop in topography to the south of lot. <br />... <br />mm <br />■:: ’ <br />. 'I• '.v|j <br />Y ; • T-h <br />f <br />h: <br />fm m-m-:t- ■ ■ =•/ - '/= ■■ <br />■' * ' <br />V -V <br />•1: