Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />• ♦ <br />Mr. Andrew J. Gotten <br />April 23, 1981 <br />Page 2 <br />total project cost is lower than anticipated costs, the City <br />Council will consider reducing the remaining resident assessments. <br />Keep in mind, each area is a separate project and stands on its <br />own merits. <br />Concerning' your concern regarding the City Council's apparent <br />reluctance to split your neeurly four acres, it is obvious the <br />City Council was not willing to create densities below average <br />lot size when this below average lot size prevelant in your area <br />was what was causing on-site problems in a rural area. <br />The City Council did assess you one unit only, at your request, <br />simply because any future subdivision requested by you was to <br />create a lot that would be served by an on-site system, not municipal <br />sewer, which was your desire when this question was asked of you <br />at our public meetings. I enclose Resolution #1178 for your <br />information. <br />4 <br />I have requested Bruce Malkerson, our lead City Attorney, to <br />address your other concerns regarding legal counsel matters. His <br />letter to you should be received by you this week. My experience <br />in these matters is that the City is always accused of attempting <br />to avoid its responsibilities when a project as you are experiencing <br />is constructed. We try to communicate and eliminate any possible <br />miscommunications. Andrew, we tried to communicate with you, <br />letters were sent, phone calls vere made, we attempted to contact <br />you every way possible but until now, we never received from you <br />any acknowledgement of our attempts to clarify these issues with <br />you. <br />Thank you for your Certificate of Title #50555. <br />Call me when you are available and we can discuss these matters <br />further. <br />Sincerely, <br />Walt^ R. Benson <br />CitWAdministrator <br />Enclosure