My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
11-16-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 11:10:52 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 10:58:20 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
* <br />Zoning File #1762 <br />November 13, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />Please review Options 1-4, Exhibit C. To be consistent <br />with past approvals, the front lot line is considered the line <br />that abutts the outlot. Option 2 keeps merely a 2' Lot 1/outlot <br />abutment. In working with the applicant and in absence of the <br />Planning Commission's input, staff recommended the currently <br />proposed 10* abutment as being wide enough to accommodate a <br />vehicle while allowing some flaring of the Lot 2 flagpole. <br />Perhaps a more realistic approach would be Option 4 using private <br />driveway easements so that the driveway can be placed further <br />north without jeopardizing Lot I's front lot line status. <br />Baiergency Access Standards <br />Wayzata Fire Chief Paul Klapprich visited the project site <br />and indicated that in this situation they will not require any <br />more than the standard driveway width but that a loop or <br />turnaround at the location of the new residence would be <br />appropriate. Klapprich indicated that his equipment is <br />accessible to the "Lydiard Road” neighborhood at its current road <br />width, although he encouraged the City to continue its <br />requirements for wider standardized roads when new subdivisions <br />are created. <br />Staff Recosmendatlon <br />Planning Commission is requested to consider the proposed <br />lot line layout as it relates to the driveway, and give staff and <br />applicant direction as to whether one of the alternative options <br />can be used which will yield more driveway design flexibility. <br />The gradlng/drainage/driveway issues have been addressed to <br />staff's satisfaction. The proposed layout requires no variances <br />to lot area or width standards, and all existing and proposed <br />buildings meet or can meet the appropriate setbacks. <br />The drainfleld sites and existing septic system will be <br />suitably protected under the proposed grading and drainage plan. <br />Staff would recommend approval of the proposed subdivision <br />(subject to any revisions in the flagpole portion of Lot 2 that <br />Planning Commission feels are appropriate) subject to the <br />following conditions: <br />1. Lot 1, containing the existing residence, will have no <br />riparian access to Lydiard Lake and is considered as a <br />non-lakeshore lot. <br />2. Lot 2 shall have riparian access to Lydiard Lake and is <br />considered a lakeshore lot. <br />3. Granting of a Flowage and Conservation Easement with <br />description that incorporates the wetland areas between <br />the OHW and the open water shoreline of Lydiard Lake. <br />L.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.