My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
11-16-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 11:10:52 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 10:58:20 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 15, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1745 - CONT. <br />BeltOMS said she would be more amenable to such a request. <br />Chair Kelley said that because of <br />building, he would not be willing <br />approval to the Council. <br />the structural needs of the <br />to make a recommendation of <br />Rowlette noted that the repairs being proposed appear to exceed 50* <br />of the valuation. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend denial <br />of Application #1745 for David Carlson, 620 Big Island, for <br />variances, based on the fact that the proposed alterations exceed <br />the allowed 50* limit and there is available land to allow <br />placement of a structure requiring less of a variance. Ayes 5, <br />nays 0. <br />Mabusth Informed Carlson that his application would now go to the <br />Council with a recommendation of denial from the Planning <br />Commission. She asked if he would rather have the application <br />tabled to allow him time to revise his plan. <br />Carlson asked that the application be tabled. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Rowlette, <br />previous motion. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />to withdraw the <br />It was moved by Bel lows, seconded by Rowlette to table AppII cat I on <br />#1745 for David Carlson of 620 Big Island, to allow the applicant <br />time to amend his proposal. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#9) CHARLES CUDO COMPANY, <br />2110 SUGARWOOO DRIVE - <br />REQUEST TO REVISE DRIVEWAY ALIGNMENT <br />Mr. Bonner was present. <br />Mabusth explained that standards were developed at the conception <br />of Sugar Woods. This Is the Cudd Company’s first time building In <br />Sugar Woods. The lot In question Is the southern lot on the loop <br />road with the retaining wall. There Is a large bass wood on the <br />property. Portions of the drive exceed the maximum allowed width <br />of 20’ within the 50’ setback area. The building permit was Issued <br />with the understanding that those standards would be met. The house <br />has been located as far to the rear as possible as there Is a sheer <br />drop behInd it. <br />I <br />4ft..mti ■ ii<niW
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.