My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
10-19-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 10:34:49 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 10:18:15 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r. <br />f: <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 18, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1737 - CONT. <br />pSlSilillii <br />Sn"l^e%^?v:yl^’s‘'cS?cu?S?ron^"" <br />Cohen asked If the City has any records of the gazebo. <br />the^gazebo^ Hollander had any picture from 1974 to 1987 showing <br />Hoi lander explained that the fire destroyed any pictures that he may have had. <br />Cardwell remembered that in 1982 he was on the property and <br />recalled the gazebo, which appeared to have been there for quite some time. • <br />Peterson noted that the existing detached screen porch is In need <br />of repair and asked if It would be possible to remove It all together. <br />Rowlette stated that the Improvements on the lot have intensified. <br />client feels the Improvements are <br />grandfathered In, and noted that Hollander is willing to remove the <br />530 square feet of additional hardcover. <br />Rowlette explained that any run-off from the property ends up <br />the lake, which is damaging the lake environment. <br />Johnson said he respected Hollander’s position, but felt they <br />should be consistent with other appiIcations. He felt that a stair <br />and landing portion would be a minimum of what is needed to gain <br />access to the lake. He felt that if permit approval was sought In <br />1974, the applicant probably would not have received the approval needed« <br />Cohen clarified that a portion of the deck and the gazebo should be removed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.