Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />% <br />Zoning File #1769 <br />October 16, 1992 <br />Page 4 <br />If applicant proceeds with the present format, the City would <br />have to grant variances to the PRD section of the new Shoreland <br />Regulation. <br />Access. Access is a major concern for this property. There is no <br />good access off of Shoreline or Dunv/oody. The sharing of an access is <br />the one most positive element of the proposed development. <br />Grading and Drainage Issues. Please refer to the City Engineer's <br />report. Exhibit B. The 4 unit proposal will require extension filling <br />to make the grades work based on the topography adjacent to Shoreline <br />Drive . <br />Flood Plain. The 931.5* elevation has not been designated. Any <br />filling below the elevation may require matching mitigation on site. <br />This will be a consideration whether property is redeveloped as a PRD <br />or single residential lots. <br />Riparian Use. If the property is proposed as a PRD the Shoreland <br />Regulations would limit riparian use (dock-slip) to one unit based on <br />the width at the shoreline. The existing single family lots each have <br />their own individual docks. <br />Please review staff sketches (Exhibit F) that provide some of the <br />redevelopment options for applicant. Planning Commission may provide <br />others. Planning Commission must provide direction to applicant on <br />the following issues: <br />Density - What density is acceptable under a PRD format? 2 - 3 - <br />PRD - Although one section of PRD codes encourages attaching and <br />clustering, in reality for most properties this is no longer <br />possible with tiering requirements of new Shoreland Regulations. <br />Review Exhibits F-1 and P-2. Would Planning Commission recommend <br />a variance to Section 10.56, Subd. 16 E-1 for the additional unit <br />placed in first 200' tier? <br />Riparian or dock rights under PRD - Would Planning Commission <br />recommend dockage rights for more than 1 unit? <br />Applicant may be best advised to proceed with separate variance <br />application for redevelopment of each lot» Applicant will ask if <br />you would recommend appeal of the restoration of the second <br />residential unit on Parcel B. How will you respond?