My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
10-19-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 10:34:49 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 10:18:15 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning Pile #1766 <br />October 13, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />Review of Current Application <br />The applicant has filed for a second conditional use permit per <br />the advise of the contractors who advised applicant that there will <br />be additional fill available. In the early discussions with <br />applicant, it was not clear as to how much fill was to be requested <br />under the current conditional use permit. The staff person accepting <br />the application advised that 20,000 cubic yard limit may provide the <br />most flexibility. It is not clear if applicant is to receive <br />additional fill from other improvement projects in the area. <br />The Public Works Director has advised that there is at the most <br />an additional 3,000 cubic yards of fill available to Mr. Eisinger from <br />the Stubbs Bay Project. Applicant should advise f he expects to <br />receive additional fill from other suppliers. <br />Shawn Gustafson of Bonestroo completed an inspection noting that <br />the area receiving the fill measures approximately 300'x500' and that <br />the placing of 20,000 cubic yards of fill will raise the elevations <br />approximately 3-4'. In our discussions, we noted that it may be <br />appropriate to ask Mr. Eisinger to review his current goals for the <br />property. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1.Should there be a final cap placed on filling of this area <br />with the current conditional use permit application? <br />2.Resolution No. 3108 was written for a two year period of <br />time expiring in April of 1994. How long should the current <br />conditional use permit be in effect? <br />3.Based on applicant's response to the question of available <br />fill within the next year, how many cubic yards should the <br />current CUP be limited to? 10,000 or 20,000? <br />Please review Exhibit K. Gustafson recommends that side slopes <br />be immediately graded to a 3-1 slope and seeded. All additional <br />to be received shall be placed to the Interior and once again <br />maintained at no greater than a 1% slope. Erosion control shall <br />remain in place throughout the winter and spring months until final <br />grading and seeding have been completed. <br />1 <br />Ii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.