Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1762 <br />September 18, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />IV. Abuts Public or <br />Private Road <br />Lot 1 <br />NO * <br />Lot 2 <br />Yes <br />Required <br />Yes <br />Y.Hardcover <br />0-75* <br />75-250' <br />0% <br />0% <br />250-500'20% As <br />Proposed <br />0% <br />+20% As <br />Proposed <br />40%+ <br />0% <br />25% <br />30% <br />iry <br />Applicant proposes to split off a 2 acre building site from his <br />existing residence parcel containing 4.69 acres of dry buildable land above <br />the 970.9 ordinary high water level of Lydiard Lake. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1.The surveyor has defined two potential drainfield sites, each 40'x90' <br />in area meeting the required setbacks from the proposed lot lines and <br />house, and the 150' lakeshore setback. It remains to be seen whether <br />testing will confirm the adequacy of these sites. The system serving <br />the existing residence was inspected on September 3rd and found to be <br />in compliance. The alternate site for the existing residence has yet <br />to be reviewed. <br />2.Lot width. Because both lots are proposed as lakeshore lots on <br />Lydiard lake, the lot width is measured ^ the shoreline and at the <br />150' setback, measured as a straight line between points at which the <br />side lot lines meet the ordinary high water elevation, and similarly <br />at the 150* setback. Lot 1 does not meet the 200* width standard at <br />either of these locations, and in fact even if the proposed division <br />line was moved eastward to increase Lot I's shoreline width to 200', <br />the 200’ requiri^ment at the 150' setback line could never be met. <br />This begs the question as to whether a lot width variance will be <br />granted for this lot configuration (which was obviously contrived to <br />give the existing house lakeshore access as well as necessary dry <br />buildable area). Note that east of the 10' corridor. Lot 1 contains <br />approximately 1.5 acres. <br />3.As it currently appears on the plat map, Boyke does not own the <br />30'xl63.78' strip adjacent to his driveway, and until he does own <br />this, the proposed subdivision would leave Lot 1 not abutting a public <br />or private roadway. If he acquires this strip, then both Lots 1 and 2 <br />will legally abut Outlet A (private road) or the adjacent parcel <br />considered by Hennepin County as dedicated City right-of-way. If he <br />does not acquire the strip, the 30' corridor of Lot 2 should be <br />platted as an outlet. <br />I <br />- -r-ir-lgj