My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
08-17-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 9:26:22 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 8:59:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1748 <br />July 9, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Property Owners List <br />C - Plat Map <br />D - Survey <br />E - Elevations <br />P - Section <br />G - Floor Plan <br />H - Hardcover Fact Sheets <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant proposes the installation of a 30'x33* detached garage <br />to be Installed at the west/street side of the lot. The proposed <br />garage will replace an existing garage in severe disrepair setback 6* <br />from Elmwood right-of-way (referenced as Summit Drive per old plat). <br />The existing structure is functionally useless as garage doors open to <br />south side of structure. Based on the age of the existing vegetation^ <br />it appears it has not been used as a garage for many years. <br />The proposed garage will require a side setback variance and lot <br />coverage variance:. The need for variances was not known at the time <br />of preliminary discussions with applicant and therefore a variance <br />application was not filed with the conditional use permit. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />A.How does the 62 s.f. of excess of structural lot coverage <br />affect your considerations? <br />B.What unique findings or hardships can be made to support a <br />recommendation of approval. <br />C.Review Exhibit D. If structure is relocated closer to area <br />where lot meets 60* width# the garage would not meet the <br />required 10* separation. Can structure be reduced to 750 <br />s.f. (25'x30M? <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.