08-17-1992 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1748 August Ilf 1992 Page 2 Additional Exhibits I ** Planning Commission Minutes 7/20/92 J - Planning Commission Action Notice K - Hardship Statement L - Option A M - Option B Original Packet Submitted for July 20th Review Description of Request The original proposal was denied at the July 20th meeting because of the number and intensity of variances sought with conditional use permit application. Since the Planning Commission meeting the applicant has consulted with staff to develop an amended proposal that would minimize variances needed by applicant. At the August 10th meeting of the CounciIf the application was referred back to the Planning Commission for review of the aunended proposal. The original garage proposed at 30'x33* has been reduced to 25'x33*. Total area reduced from 990 s.f. to 825 s.f. Structure still requires a 15* side setback. Note at the 35* setback line the lot measures 53* in width. Applicant has submitted two proposals. Option Af Exhibit Lf preferred by applicantf places the structure closer to the north side lot line at 13' meeting the 15* setback at the south lot line. Option B centers the detached structure at the mid'*polnt requiring a 1* side setback on both north and south side lot lines. There is no longer a need for a lot coverage variance since the accessory structure has been reduced in size and again there is no hardcover variance sought by applicant within the 250-500' setback line. The only variance sought now by applicant is a side setback line to the north lot line. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit K which is reviewed as follows: 1. Lot width at 50* where a required side setback is 15* would limit the width of the structure to 20*. 2. 3. There are no adjacent lands available for purchase. Placing widest portion of structure in an east-west direction has minimized tree removal and the saving of mature trees within the rear yard maintaining natural visual buffer from adjacent yards.