My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
08-17-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 9:26:22 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 8:59:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
s <br />tv' <br />TO:Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />FROHs Stephen Weckman, On-Site System Manager <br />DATE July 15, 1992 <br />SUBJECT: #1757 CUP - A. iiunser - Septic Review <br />Septic testing is required for this parcel indicating <br />alternate sites for both the guest house and the main residence. <br />During the review of this subdivision by Jean Mabusth, it was <br />determined that the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka <br />encroached within 75' of the existing guest house as well as the <br />septic system for the residence. This encroachment makes the <br />septic system non-conforming based on the shoreland regualtions <br />and revised spetic code requirements. Jean noted in her March 12, <br />1992 review for the subdivision request that additional testing <br />must be submitted indicating a second alternate drainfield site <br />for the guest house as well as the abandonment of the existing <br />septic system with the Installation of the replacement system <br />using one of the alternate site for the guest house within one <br />year of the final subdivision. In order to be consistent with <br />Orono Septic Code Section 12.30 however, the septic system for <br />this guest house must be replaced within 90 days of the approval <br />of a CUP. <br />Mark Gronberg has been contacted regarding this issue and <br />indicated that the two alternate drainfield sites for the guest <br />house as well *-s the alternate site for the main residence should <br />be feasible and will submit an addendum identifying these sites <br />on the property survey. As per our discussion, best way to <br />acheive adequate sites for sewage treatment ’^ould be to have one <br />alternate site for the guest house while extending the other <br />alternate site already designated to make it large enough for <br />both the main residence as well as the guest house. Based on the <br />soil testing informa\:ion already provided and previous <br />inspections of the property in question, the drainfield sites <br />should have no problem in treating septic effluent affectively. <br />n1 <br />i' <br />m nit oiiifiiifl
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.