My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
07-20-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 10:38:38 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 8:58:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1752 <br />July 9, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />30on as it was realized that portions of the deck were located within <br />the 0-75* setback area. There is a 6' encroachment of the lakeshore <br />protected zone and 105 s.f. of structural hardcover located within the <br />0~75' setback area. <br />Applicant has just recently purchased the property in April of <br />this year and p^ to complete other rennovations within the interior <br />of the structure Upon a site inspection, members will note remnants <br />of a former gravel drive that was located within the street yard. Mr. <br />Kalweit plans to complete the restoration of the grassed yard as soon <br />as the interior improvements are completed. Based on staff's review <br />of the hardcover within the 75—250' setback area, it appears that no <br />hardcover variances are necessary for the structural repairs of the <br />deck outside of the 75' setback area. <br />Review Exhibit B, technically applicant is also required to seek <br />approval of an average lakeshore setback variance as entire structure <br />is located in front of the average setback line of the adjacent flag <br />lot to the immediately north. A commons out lot abuts the lot to the <br />Immediate south. Deck structure has no impact on the lakeshore views <br />of the flag lot nor on the house to the immediate south of the Commons <br />lot. <br />Staff has enclosed copies of the grading and drainage plans and <br />plat for North Arm, Exhibits G and H. It is staff's understanding that <br />the applicant wants the City to address their concern regarding a <br />drainage problem along the south side lot line. An underground PVC <br />pipe outlets within the lakeshore yard of the applicant. The plat. <br />Exhibit H, shows the City did not obtain the necessary drainage ana <br />utility easements along the oouth side of the lot. Staff inspected <br />the site and can confirm that theie is no rip rap at the outlet nor <br />was there any sign of any improvement to minimize erosion. Exhibits <br />have been included as merely information for Planning Commission as <br />staff has not received a written statement regarding applicant s <br />concerns <br />Hardship Statement <br />Please review Exhibit A. <br />tfiiini iiMiai If hiiiifciii a. Vij
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.