Laserfiche WebLink
Si. <br />[•V 'm:'■y ' r^'. <br />t :,4‘; ^ ■ <br />.*• <br />..*1 <br />■^i <br />: ■ <br />Zoning File #1749 <br />July 16, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />m- <br />"K«- ;• <br />fe*''-' <br />SRSf <br />■ifeu,. <br />W- Dettcnriptlon of Request <br />■-i, <br />r-- <br />vijf <br />' H ^ <br />The applicant proposes the division of Lot 4, Tanglewood into two <br />—--..parcels. Lot 1, the developed lot shall continue to achieve access <br />ISP'Via Tract E of RLS #1418. The owner of Lot 4 has never developed an <br />access off of Tanglewood Road. Lot 1 will remain a through lot.^ All <br />RR-IB area and setback standards have been «’»-*-isfied for the existing <br />structures on proposed Lot 1. All exi - structures and septic <br />drainfield area meet the required setbac/c jf the shore land dis^i<^. <br />Each of the lots meet the required width of 200' at the rear of the <br />L front street setback of 50'. As already noted above. Lot 2 will <br />achieve access via Tanglewood and will be subject to all the private <br />covenants currently in effect. The new curb cut or access at <br />Tanglewood will require approval of the Public Works Director. <br />■:« <br />Review Exhibits D and E 1-2. Weckraan's memo confirms that each <br />site has adequate area for development of conforming on-site septic <br />systems.,^ <br />% <br />Staff has included the road section for Tanglewood and the <br />preliminary and final subdivision resolutions granting approval of the <br />plat (Exhibits I, J and K). Note that in 1978 the paving of private <br />roads was not required. Portions of the road have been paved by <br />individual property owners. As the enclosed resolutions note, there <br />are private covenants for maintenance purposes in place and the City <br />had obtained the necessary access and utility easements over the road <br />outlet. <br />b!i-■ <br />,f, . '■■■■ <br />-.*.r <br />Lot 1 will meet the area requirements for a guest house use as <br />Lot 1 is shown at 4.42 acre. The guest house is currently served by <br />the existing septic system that serves the residence and alternate <br />septic testing confirms that the guest house will continue to be <br />served by a shared system. In reviewing the records (Exhibits M ^Dd <br />N), staff notes that the guest house was constructed in 1967 and the <br />current residence in 1960. The code at that time would have required <br />a conditional use permit for a guest house. Staff is not clear as to <br />the relevance of the information written out on building permit for <br />guest house as RLS #1418 was not approved until 1976. At any rate, no <br />subdivision would have had an impact on the guest house use because of <br />its proximity to the principal structure. Staff should have required <br />a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission must make a <br />recommendation concerning the need for applicant to file a current <br />conditional use permit for the guest house. <br />The pond on Lot 1 has existed on the property for many years and <br />was probably installed by the original owner. In the past, the City <br />has always asked for a drainage easement over the defined or existing <br />retention areas. Staff would recommend that the City obtain a <br />drainage easement over the pond area. <br />' <br />V. <br />K. T-.: