Laserfiche WebLink
,v m <br />>' <br />Memo <br />July 15, 1992 <br />Page 3 | <br />Issues for Discussion <br />The Planning Commission should answer the following questions in <br />determining whether the proposed ordinance as drafted is necessary and <br />^appropriate: <br />1. Should all future use of non-encased styrofoam for dock <br />flotation be banned? <br />Should existing users of such product be required to <br />eliminate non-encased styrofoam? <br />If so, what is an appropriate and reasonable time table for <br />removal to occur? Should there be one final deadline date, <br />or is the incremental reduction appropriate? <br />Should the ordinance apply to private as well as commercial <br />docks throughout the entire City? <br />Does Planning Commission have any recommendation as to the <br />degree of enforcement this subject deserves? i.e. Is an <br />annual survey of docks needed (extremely time consuming), or <br />would this be enforced only or a complaint or "catch—as— <br />catch can" basis? <br />Staff RecoBOnendation <br />Planning Commission is advised to review the proposed ordinance <br />and, if the ordinance is determined to be appropriate, recommend any <br />changes which you feel might make it more appropriate, reasonable, and <br />fair to both those who must ultimately replace docks and those who <br />must put up with their litter. <br />my. <br />V..- <br />Ufa ■ : <br />-.I*, V; , ■ <br />-m.Vm •• <br />mmm