Laserfiche WebLink
—•'.'if <br />-> <br />i5 <br />A.Zoning File #1754 <br />July 15, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />iJiS r-'jTVU <br />*I <br />filed the variance application as soon as the updated survey was <br />completed. <br />The deck slightly encroaches the average lakeshore setback lijie. <br />Note Mr. Menth, the neighbor most impacted by the encroachment, has <br />submitted a letter reaffirming his support of Mr. Bullock s variance <br />requ'-'t. Note also that at the east lot line the deck is located 9 <br />instead of the required 10 *. <br />Ploase review Exhibit E. Applicant has provided the original <br />real estate listing information that shows the portion of the second <br />level deck that was recently reconstructed. The inspectors have <br />confirmed that the deck was not expanded. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Please review Exhibit A. As Mr. Bullock's statement notes the <br />shape of the lots and the fact that all lots are located on a curve or <br />cove of the lake a slight encroachment of the average setback line has <br />no real impact on the views of the adjacent residences. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />75-250' setback area consists of 45.6% hardcover. 744 s.f. <br />or 6.7% is landscape area underlain with plastic. Applicant <br />has advised that because of the sloping topography landscape <br />areas underlain with plastic have been installed along the <br />sides of the house to prevent drainage problem. <br />Are there other areas of non-essential hardcover that can be <br />considered for removal? <br />Any recommendation of approval must contain the condition that <br />applicant obtain a penalty building permit for construction of decV, <br />pm V V- <br />? ■ <br />• ' . . / <br />; i.■mxm <br />*7 <br />■> <br />' ' C‘ - <br />% <br />‘Vi. <br />'W- <br />• <br />AI <br />Iter <br />- TV- t <br />M: <br />y "w '•) i1 <br />V- *- -j' <br />m <br />K' ■ ■ -v" <br />•te » ^