My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
05-18-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 9:43:51 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 8:54:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REOULAfi ORONO COUNCIU MEETINO - OCTOBER 14, 19S1 • ^ <br />, / <br />#1679 - CONT. <br />Miner noted that at the Planning Commission meeting, Jabbour <br />noted that the application could be split and this portion sent <br />on to the Council for review. He noted that Gaffron also <br />suggested at the time of filing the applicat-*on that they be put <br />together, to be reviewed as a compreher, jive plan for the <br />property. He noted that the garage portion of the application was <br />going to be denied at the Planning Commission so they tabled <br />instead to allow the applicant time to submit revised plans. <br />Jabbour noted that they choose to separate tho application <br />because this part spearheaded the entire application and because <br />of the urgency to finish the bathhouse. <br />m <br />Jabbour noted that one issue is the structure cannot be improved <br />more than 50% of the 1975 valuation, which must be determined. <br />Gaffron stated that this structure was never valued or <br />recorded by the assessor. <br />even <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table <br />application #1679 for William Miller of 2691 Casco Point Road, <br />requesting approval of after—the—fact variance request for <br />maint /’lance to an existing bathhouse/gazebo. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />Miller noted ha has a problem with tabling the application, <br />also noted that he would withdraw the garage portion of <br />application right now if it would allow them to vote on <br />bathhouse portion of the application. He noted that he has <br />Intention to build Just a two car garage as suggested by <br />Planning Commission. <br />He <br />the <br />the <br />no <br />the <br />Mabusth noted that to date revised plans have not been received <br />by staff. • <br />Mayor Peterson noted that if the applicafit withdraws the <br />application —and then later reapplies, he will have to pay the <br />application fee again and will probably be charged an after-the- <br />fact fee because work was continued after notification. <br />Miller explained that the siding was put on after Jhe stop work <br />order but only for preservation raasons because of high winds. <br />Mayor Peterson reminded Council that the first issue to <br />is whether the repairs to the structure are over 50% of the total <br />valuation of the structure.‘‘ <br />Goetten understood that normal maintenance has always^been <br />allowed by Counci 1such as painting, but footings are considered <br />structural. <br />* <br />Mayor Peterson noted it is Orono's hope to soma day remove alT of <br />these non-conforming structures through this process. <br />■ 1^^.. <br />•^5 <br />'.I <br />■ 'j
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.