Laserfiche WebLink
X‘ <br />* •»■' . . "J <br />r£r-^'V ;■ ■ ' <br />;9'-, <br />V- <br />.' ( <br />POPHAM HAIK <br />SCHNOBRICH a KAUFMAN. LTD <br />OtNVCK. COi^RA&O <br />TtL 903*BB3-1200 <br />Miami . Fv^ioa <br />in' <br />Suite 3300 <br />222 SOUTH NINTH STREET <br />MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA S5402 <br />TEL 6 1 2-333-4800 <br />FAX 6 1 2-334-0888 <br />iNTCflNATIOMAL OWWICW.%: <br />LftIPZtG. GCAMANV <br />TKL OI 137-41 -49 19471 <br />til 909>B30-OOJO • . ; ■ . <br />WAiHINaTPW. O.C. J <br />TIL 202-962-9700 vj <br />THOMAS J. BARRETT, ESQ. <br />DIRECT DIAL (812) 334-2878 <br />STUTTOAHT. OIRMANY <br />til 01149-711-296303 <br />i\-:' <br />May 12, 1992 <br />n:f <br />:j I <br />r;*Y c.- <br />»'•••?i: <br />r'w— <br />1 <br />. i <br />"A <br />VIA FACSIMILE <br />ORIGIHAL TO FOLLOW BT 1 kill MAY 1 3 B92 <br />m <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Building and Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Municipal Offices <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323-006 <br />Re: Application No. 1734 - John and Mary Burger <br />3750 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision <br />Application <br />f.Dear Jeanne: <br />In response to your letter of May 1, 1992 with respect to <br />the application noted above, I point out that Orono Ordinance <br />601 subd. 2 specifically allows the City to regulate private <br />roads by allowing access over them to other persons who could <br />reasonably be expected to use the road to get to their home and <br />to their invitees. As I understand it the potential <br />intensification of the use is probably limited to one or two <br />homes which may use the private road in question in order to <br />achieve access. The alternative access which has been discussed <br />with respect to subdivision would require, as you point out in <br />your letter, a long and lengthy roadway through a designated <br />wetland. <br />■'Yf'I also understand that we can look forward to the new <br />users agreements to share in their prorata costs of the <br />maintenance of the road. <br />Thus, I conclude that the proposed use of Landmark Drive <br />is reasonable under the circumstances and consistent with both <br />our ordinance and other applicable law. <br />Ifr> <br />B/j ao/s4rrjB <br />r:. ^ - q