Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Pile #1734 <br />May 13, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />limited dry land area is located predominately in the west portion of <br />Outlot B. County Road 84 is classified as a Scenic Parking in the CMP <br />and is approved at maximum width of 50' to 66'. The Hennepin DOT has <br />been asked to review the plat. Staff will report on their concerns at <br />your meeting. <br />Lot Configuration <br />As in the sketch plan review, applicants propose a lot width <br />variance for proposed Lot 1 shown at a 210' width where a 300' width <br />is required. Planning Commission members conceptually approved the <br />width variance along with the buildability of the lot by seeking area <br />credit of Outlot A. Lot 2 satisfies all LR-IA zoning standards. <br />Lot 2 <br />... <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />2 acres dry <br />Total 4.51 acres <br />2.9 ares dry <br />Access <br />Access for Lot 2 shall remain as is via County Road 84. Access <br />to Lot 1, Review Exhibit I, shall be via Landmark Drive under the <br />authorization of the public underlying easements granted to the City <br />at the time of the Bayside Landing platting and, finally, via a <br />private access easement granted in favor of proposed Lot 1 over Let 1, <br />Block 2, Bayside Landing. The City Attorney has been asked for his <br />written opinion concerning the issue of legal access to lots outside <br />of original Bayside Landing properties via the public easements <br />granted to the City over Landmark Drive. Review Exhibits G and H. <br />Barrett has provided a written opinion reaffirming the directives and <br />intent of Ordinance 6.01, Subdivision 2 and other applicable law. <br />Staff has been in contact with the attorney for Mr. Burger and he <br />confirms that Burger has met with the authorized representative of the <br />homeowner's association. Burger has agreed to a share in the original <br />cost of the road and in the execution of an agreement confirming <br />future owner of Lot I's share in the cost of maintenance and upkeep of <br />Landmark Drive. As of this writing, staff has received no written <br />confirmation of these agreements but it appears that Burger has solved <br />the issue of access via Landmark Drive and the Bayside Landing <br />properties. Staff will ask applicants' attorney to comment further at <br />our meeting. <br />Septic Review <br />Review Exhibits J, K, and L. Weekman confirms in his memo of May <br />6, 1992 that Lot 1 has been found to have adequate, suitable soils for <br />principal and alternate on-site septic systems that meet all required <br />setbacks. Staff did not require additional septic testing for Lot 2 <br />as this property will receive sewer if ordered for the area. Weekman <br />also advised that staff had done a review of all properties within the <br />i