04-20-1992 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

V'. ir>i‘ V^' *r' r>-^- r^T-, ■r-” ^- • 4-.'T.,.V’ Zoning Pile #1714 April 10, 1992 Page 2 laiiM 5. c:mm fe. . . '.^i-v^-' v ■■ - B. mi :. ! ;„<iL (■ V ••#:mmmmm Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 A. Hardcover within the 0—75' setback area *= 5,625 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing =» 0 Proposed *» 56.2 s.f. or 1% Hardcover within the '’5-250' setback area = 8,737.5 s.f Allowed * 2,184.3 s.f. or 25% Existing 2,205.7 s.f. or 25.2% Proposed per original plan = 2712.34 s.f. cr 31% [this includes expanded paved area to provide backing out capabilities in street yard at 172 s.f.] ■ Proposed per amended plan * 2,799.34 s.f. or 32%* *Review Exhibit C hardcover facts have been amended by staff, 0-75' hardcover is at 56.2 s.f. not 60 s.f., 75- ^ V 250' setback area hardcover for lakeside deck is 195 s.f. rather than 207 s.f. as shown by applicant ^ List of Exhibits - A - Planning Commission Action Notice ® “ Original Proposal C - Hardcover Fact Sheet 75-250' D - Amended Proposal E - Floor Floor Rerview of Amended Application The amended proposal shows a reduction in hardcover within the 0- 75' (originally 129 s.f., amended 56.2 s.f) and the setback reduced from 65' to 72'. The majority of the lakeside deck has now been located in the 75-250' setback area resulting in a 1% increase in hardcover within the 75-250' area [original 31%, amended proposal « 32%]. Garage and driveway expansion as shown in the original application has not been altered with the amended proposal. Review of the Hardships and Findings The severely steeped lakeside banks shield proposed deck expansion from the views at lakeshore. Proposed detached garage shall encroach no closer within substandard street cr side setbacks of current garage. The lakeside deck will not encroach the average lakeshore setback determined by the closest projections of the decks on the adjacent properties. Location of mature trees within the southwest side yard. M •j'® «'i V, -i:-: ■ — — — ■