Laserfiche WebLink
i-’-c;4a|^,: ,v V;, .;;‘;«^;v^^j? <br />3%^ ... <br />S^?' ■ <br />'•^%f . ^ ■ ■’ -> f-’>*■'*»J ^v‘ *• r*‘ <br />aiSiSi:, <br />V .. : 'j <br />■') <br />SJ?.v <br />rfSil»! =■ '• <br />j.w”^ij^-'’v; •' <br />I»cj,. <br />.. .iiU <br />■m'-^L«r'^ ■ •t.-'TTOa <br />♦ :iii, .1 <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 20, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE «1698 » CONT. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend denial of <br />Application #1698 for Jim Rivers of 1442 Shoreline Drive, for the <br />after-the-fact variance for the enclosed deck as the permit Issued <br />in 1976 specifically stated that approval was only for access <br />stairs, and only those access stairs can remain as indicated on <br />that permit. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend that the <br />enclosed deck be removed by July 1, 1992. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />(#4) *1700 DALE MCCURDY, <br />4041 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - <br />REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL REVIEW <br />Mrs. McCurdy was present for this application. <br />Mabusth explained the applicants seek approval of the <br />intensification of hardcover where excesses already exist. The <br />applicants propose the construction of an 8*x17* second story deck <br />over an existing patio. She noted the application was originally <br />brought before the Planning Commission absent an updated survey and <br />hardcover inventory as the applicants had asked for special <br />consideration to use an earlier survey and inventory review from <br />a 1986 appiI cat ion. The appiicants have provided an updated survey <br />of the property since Council concurred with the Planning <br />Commission that an updated survey was necessary. She stated the <br />current proposal does not propose an increase in hardcover. <br />McCurdy noted that the original survey was done by staff for the <br />1976 review, and the current submittal was done by Coffin and <br />Qronberg. She noted the deck was intended to be included with the <br />1986 addition. <br />Rowlette noted that with the 1986 review, staff indicated Ox <br />hardcover In the 0-75* zone. She asked of what the additional <br />hardcover consisted. <br />Mabusth explained that the staff Inventory of 1986 was incomplete, <br />and the hardcover listed on the current hardcover Inventory is not <br />new hardcover. The percentage for the 0-75’ zone includes lakeshore <br />decking, access stairs, and part of the house. <br />Chair Kelley asked about further hardcover reductions. <br />K 'l, ,, ^ r>'4 <br />.. i:-V <br />W: <br />i <br />* '