Laserfiche WebLink
•. - f. <br />Vfr. ^yA <br />:« <br />Zoning Pile #1721 <br />March 12, 1992 <br />Page 4 <br />Septic <br />m <br />Please review Exhibit F. Weckman confirms that all septic <br />systems meet the required setback from Tanager Lake (100' <br />structure, 75* septic) and Browns Bay wetland (26* structure and <br />75' septic). Septic systems all test out for mound design. The <br />20' setback from proposed lot lines can be met by each of the <br />sites. The City will require that the septic areas on Lots 3, 4 <br />and 5 be staked prior to any lot grading or road construction <br />activities. It shall be necessary to provide permanent staking and <br />fencing for the septic areas on Lots 2 and 5. The private drives <br />to each of the proposed residence sites will travel close to the <br />septic areas. Because there is no other suitable area for septic <br />sites on these lots, it will be necessary to protect the proposed <br />test sites. <br />. ^ _ The City will also ask that a swale be installed along the <br />shared lot lines of 3 and 4 takes drainage to Tanager Lake. The <br />swale will drain low seasonal retention area very close to the <br />septic test site on Lot 3. <br />r’. <br />Gradinq/Drainaqe/Wetland <br />•13, ^ V ■ <br />All wetland areas shall be designated as drainage easements on <br />the plat; Tanager Lake at 929.4, Browns Day wetland at 932.3, <br />wetland to the north of Lot 1 ac the 932.3 and wetlands within Lots <br />2 and 3 at the 933.3. Drainage easement shall be taken over <br />drainageway that extends from low retention area to Browns Bay <br />wetland under proposed private roadbed. It is this wetland that <br />shall retain the majority of run-off from developed lots and road <br />hardcover. <br />m <br />■ "■» ' <br />■■ -4! <br />U‘ <br />In early discussions with Ron Quanbeck of the Minnehaha Creek <br />Watershed District, based on the hydraulic information and <br />elevations taken on March 9th (since Cook report of 3/6/92), we <br />have concurred that the 932.3 elevation is acceptable as the OHWL <br />for the Browns Bay wetland. Review Exhibit H, the culvert under <br />the railroad track, the outlet at the south side was found to be <br />at 926.95. The invert at the north side was not detected but it is <br />assumed there is no more than a foot of difference at approximately <br />927.94. The culvert is lower than the elevation of Lake Minnetonka <br />at a 929.4 OHWL. Browns Bay wetland is directly Influenced by the <br />lake level of Lake Minnetonka. Quanbeck says that the Lake level <br />right now is at 930 and that the OHWL of the wetland would be <br />approximated at 1' above tne lake level of Lake Minnetonka so the <br />932.3 is a very generous calling on the part of the applicant's <br />engineer. It should also be noted that the original 933.8 <br />elevation of the tracks of the railroad would not be the control <br />elevation because the surveyor has also located a ditch that drains <br />along the north side of the railroad to the west (Tanager Lake) at <br />the 933 elevation. The Public Works Department has partially <br />• I <br />m kni. <br />i <br />'•m <br />•■r .U <br />¥