02-13-1992 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'i. '.' v' • * t >v- • V '. ’ V - vtfj. *•, • ► ■ . vO*. * V.1 •i^• i.-* p v :; i: • «i» > ♦|^-, ►•} ■ • V# t;vr-v-. •«’ . V-* ^7 V'*** J ..iT. :Wi » >m ■t'--.‘:--A" C, ^7, City of ORONO CITY » OF . ORONO resolution of the city council NO. 1 " >Q--------------- :v • ‘.A» I f- . 7. Tho locaticn of applicant b cxistiruj house poses a problem in locating a suitable deck. 8. Applicant has stated that he has rt-moved feet of existing h..rdcrver walkways in the 0-7a setback zone. 9. The front lino of the proposed deck docs not extend beyond the front line of the home to the south. i •I 10. Sand is to be placed under tho surface of the deck as was done in the Krutzig application Vg\backprevent encroachment of hardcover into the 0 75 setoacK none, hence no hardcover variance is requiret.. 11. The deck in low to the ground and will not be noticeable from the lake. 12. A deck on either side of tae house docs not appear to be practical bocaune of limited space. Tho 15* elevation «nd at®®? ?iVerUn'd run^7,'Vi‘.“';n"=';“oV7'd rVo.-th.'V.kc .t .bout . 7C* horizontal distance. i-svia ■ ■ . *■> 15. Tho variance will not modify the character of tho neighborhood. !%• 16. The proposed deck still meets the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 50' minimum setback for Genera 1 Development lakes such as Uke Minnetonka. iv. *«■ -?»?,h:- K ■■■ J • ‘ V’ .r* •••»» •* . 1? The City Council has considered this application inpiudine tho findings and rocommen ations of the Planning CWMilb, report, b’/cuy „.ff, ement. by tb. •PPUc.nt fnd th« .Jf.cT ot th. propo.od v.rUnce on the h.«lth. safety and welfare of the community. •1 5 ,• • V* J ^ V41 V.•••■'* -pooe 2 of 5 • ' '1;^ . V--V