My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
02-13-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2023 4:42:37 PM
Creation date
1/18/2023 4:26:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a: <br />V'** <br />vv- <br />iHit,/--? _ <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 3028_________ <br />-«,3w-*r:.' <br />K* ■*rv • <br />i^'r <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTIONS 10.22r SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2, <br />AND 10.55r SUBDIVISION 8 <br />PILE #1685 <br />-:■> <br />■ ■* <br />s WHEREAS r Edward F. Baker (hereinafter "the applicai^) <br />is owner of the property located at 3059 Farview Lane within the <br />City of Orono (her^einaf ter "City") and legally described as <br />follows: <br />Lot 6, Block 1, Farview, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br />(hereinafter "the property"); and <br />no hardcover or structure is normally allowed, and encroaching on <br />the 26' wetland setback line where no structure or hardcover is <br />normally allowed. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota:FINDINGS <br />I <br />1.This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1685 <br />The property is located in the LR~1A, Single Family <br />Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />A. <br />fc-iK <br />I l'-2' walkway around 3 sides. The decking around <br />the pool and associated stairway to the lower <br />level are necessary for safety and convenience. <br />The proposed 10' encroachment of the normally <br />required 26’ wetland setback is not of significant <br />magnitude to outweigh the safety issues. <br />Page 1 of 6 <br />J ' <br />':?■ • <br />mm: <br />f..
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.