Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1706 <br />January 15, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />building pads/lots (specifically on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, <br />Block 2). Outlet D is classified as a private driveway and the <br />code has no specific setback standards for structures adjacent to <br />driveways. The City will ask that the 50' setback for all <br />construction be maintained from Outlet D. <br />As all pads/lots appear to be over 1.99 acres, are lot <br />coverage constraints necessary? Applicant has noted at an <br />earlier meeting that these covenants will attempt to minimize <br />‘ree removal and disturbance of the steeper sloped areas. Peview <br />Exhibit H, the map that designates the arecs in excess of 18% <br />slope. Should we restrict construction v’ithin these areas? If <br />so, consider the impact on Lot 1, Block 1 - would you allow <br />accessory structures to be constructed in front of the front line <br />of the principal structure on Lot 1, Block 1? This would <br />prohibit all additions to the west, north and east side of the <br />existing structure. Certainly the open space areas (Outlets A <br />and B) can be prohibited from any improvements involving land <br />alterations. If prohibiting construction within areas in excess <br />of 18% slopes is too restrictive, what other methods or controls <br />are realistic? <br />In your approval recommendation the following items should be <br />addressed: <br />1. Special setbacks. <br />2.Restrictions on tree removal and land alterations within <br />steep sloped areas. <br />Options: <br />A. Prohibit all land alterations/construction within areas <br />found to be in excess of 18% slope. <br />B. Create additional buffer areas within each building pad <br />similar to Sugar Woods. <br />C. Hardcover controls. <br />D. Others deemed appropriate by Planning Commission. <br />3.Require open space easement over Outlets A and B. Easement <br />to include future access drive to Nature Conservancy <br />property. <br />4.The staking of alternate septic site within Lot 1, Block 1 <br />and primary and alternate site in Lot 1, Block 2 prior to <br />private road and private drive construction. <br />5.Because of special topographic constraints on Lot 1, Block 1 <br />and Lot 1, Block 2, would Planning Commission consider <br />allowing accessory structures to be constructed in front of <br />the front line of the principal structures? <br />6.Applicant to confirm that easement serving property to <br />immediate east is located within private driveway outlet. <br />Outlet D. <br />» <br />u* 1 <br />}