Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Zoning File #1700 <br />November 14, 1991 <br />Page 2 <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant seeks approval of a 7'xl8' second story deck to be <br />Installed to the north or street side of the existing residence. <br />The deck will be located over an existing patio resulting in no <br />net increase of hardcover. Improvement will result in a 119 s.f. <br />of additional structural hardcover on the property. Lot coverage <br />with the proposed deck will be at 11.4%. <br />Review Exhibit F. Applicant claimed that the deck was <br />originally proposed at the time of the construction of the <br />addition to the west side of the residence in 1976. The patio <br />doors were proposed at the second story level. Staff can find no <br />record of the original plans that would show the proposed second <br />story deck. Applicant has been asked to provide a copy of the <br />those plans for our review. Applicant commenced construction of <br />the second story deck believing that the deck was already covered <br />in the 1976 building permit. Applicant was asked to stop <br />construction and to file for the necessary building permit. <br />In reviewing the existing property and the hardcover facts <br />submitted for the 1986 review, staff has noted errors in those <br />original calculations involving the 0-75' setback area. <br />In addition, the current hardcover facts do not reflect the <br />driveway in its current configuration that were installed at the <br />time of the construction of the detached garage. Staff has asked <br />that Mr. McCurdy provide upoated survey and hardcover facts for <br />the current review. Mr. McCurdy has advised that the updated <br />survey and hardcover review will cost more than the second story <br />deck. Review Exhibit A-1. <br />Applicant has filed the application submitting the former <br />hardcover facts asking for special consideration as the proposed <br />improvements will not result in an increase in hardcover within <br />the 75-250' setback area. If it is the intention of the Planning <br />Commission to recommend approval of the application that results <br />in 119 s.f. of additional structural hardcover, your options are <br />as follows: <br />A.To recommend approval of second story deck addition and <br />to advise applicant that if other improvements are <br />proposed at some future date, applicant will be <br />responsible for providing an updated survey and <br />hardcover inventory for the property. <br />/iMiirlt