Laserfiche WebLink
LA21-000066 <br />January 17, 2023 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />allowed. The deck would add 64 s.f. of new structural coverage where an awning over concrete <br />patio exists today. <br /> <br />Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) <br />The proposed project is replacing a deck and sloped covered awning with a new deck and stairs. <br />The proposed deck creates a new vertical encroachment into the setback which allows for a flat <br />walkable deck and new railing. The existing awning is approximately 9’ above the existing grade <br />and the proposed deck is approximately 14’ above the existing grade. <br /> <br />The average lakeshore setback only permits improvements to be 3.5 feet tall lakeward of the <br />setback. The deck is shown to encroach 4.5’ into the average lakeshore setback and the <br />proposed stairs will encroach almost 10’ into the average lakeshore setback. The proposed deck <br />would not expand the footprint of the original improvement. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br />on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br />recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br />to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br />Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br />also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, <br />subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br />use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The lot includes <br />difficulties in its small size and width, and proximity to the lake. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to <br />replace and extend an existing deck for the front entryway of a single-family dwelling <br />are consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of a deck <br />on an existing home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the <br />required lakeshore setbacks appears to be reasonable as the property’s reduced <br />size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore and placement of the existing <br />home creates difficulties. While the nature of the hardcover is changing slightly, <br />no increase in overall hardcover is proposed. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The uniquely small lot size, width and location to the lake and roadway within