My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
01-17-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2023 8:30:00 AM
Creation date
1/18/2023 7:56:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Thursday, August 24, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 8 <br /> <br />Mr. Gamble said that is part of the South lot, rather than the North lot. <br /> <br />Barnhart agreed that it is, but it’s also lake-frontage and that’s where the minimum width would come in. <br />He said this lot has four frontages, which they do not see a lot of. <br /> <br />Crosby asked to clarify that Lot 2474 is non-conforming and Lot 2480 is conforming. <br /> <br />Barnhart answered yes. <br /> <br />Johnson noted to make the split it becomes non-conforming because the “finger” goes up the side and <br />does not meet the lake width. <br /> <br />Crosby asked if the Council has ever done this in the past, noting that right now for conformity, they are <br />calculating the land North of the lagoon. <br /> <br />Barnhart answered yes, they are including some of the land North of the lagoon for both lots. <br /> <br />Crosby asked if it’s a possibility to combine them into one lot, although that obviously wouldn’t be a <br />lakeshore lot. <br /> <br />Walsh stated you just can’t get four lots out of it. <br /> <br />Crosby agreed. <br /> <br />Barnhart said he thinks the challenge with this parcel is where the boundary line is for Lot 2474 south of <br />the lagoon. He noted they are limited by that amount of land and they cannot create or add more land to <br />make it wide enough and that is ultimately the issue. He said if they had another 20 feet perhaps, there <br />would be space for four lots. <br /> <br />Seals noted she thinks the Council is in agreement that they do not see four lots, but are trying to help the <br />Applicant find three lots. <br /> <br />Crosby noted on the map if they drew a line across the top lots, could the top half possibly be a lot off of <br />shoreline, it would not be a lakeshore lot, if it’s big enough to be conforming. Then they would be talking <br />about a total of three lots rather than four. <br /> <br />Walsh said they’re trying to give guidance but the Council doesn’t need to design it. <br />Crosby said he understands that and he’s asking if that is a possibility to basically put the two half lots <br />together to make one lot off of shoreline. <br /> <br />Barnhart said that is similar to what was proposed in March and the issue is not the area North of the <br />lagoon, the issue is that the amount of land on the peninsula and the amount of land where the boundary <br />line is constrains the subdivision of this lot because there is not enough buildable acreage South of the <br />lagoon with the required width. Earlier, Staff had identified a potential of combining both of those lots to <br />create one conforming lot, and then they’d have two lots on the North for a total of three. He said that’s <br />the best way they can do it, but looking at it, there are two separate property owners and they’d have to <br />work together on getting to that point, or acquire additional land from the private residence to the West to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.