Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA22-000060 <br />January 17, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to split the parcel at the lagoon and creating 2 parcels total. <br /> <br />The lots would be required to connect to municipal sanitary sewer. The applicant has not <br />indicated how they would access off Shoreline Drive. The applicant has not provided <br />information for the proposed use on the northern parcel. The southern parcel has an existing <br />family home. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Analysis <br /> <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br /> <br />Lot Analysis Area Required Width Required Conforming? <br />Existing-2474 <br />Carman Street <br /> 1.6 Acres (excludes the <br />lagoon) <br /> Split Zoning 124.95’ 140’ No <br /> Proposed- Lot <br />North of Inlet <br />(LR-1C-1) <br />0.95 Acre/41,246 sq.ft <br />(Dry-32,048 sq.ft <br />Wet-9,198 sq.ft) <br />.5 acre/ <br />21,780 sq.ft. <br />124.95' 100' Yes <br /> <br />Proposed- Lot <br />South of Inlet <br />(LR-1B) <br />0.68 Arce/ 29,709 sq.ft 1 acre/ <br />43,560 sq.ft. <br />124.95' 140' No, Lot area <br />and width <br /> <br />Due to the configuration of the lots and the shoreline, the lot south of the inlet cannot meet the <br />LR-1B lot area requirements unless it is combined with additional land. The Planning <br />Commission and City Council would have to support variances for the lot area and lot width for <br />the southern lot. <br /> <br />Engineer Comments <br />City Engineer: <br />• City sewer and Water would be available however there are not an existing stubs <br />so applicants would have to tap into the mains. Due to their locations this <br />would require excavating into the county road which would require a county <br />permit in addition to the City utility permits. <br />• Per the wetland mapper most of the area is a class one preserve <br />wetland. Buildable land may be very limited <br /> <br />Hennepin County Provide comments in 2020 regarding the development of 2474 and 2480 <br />Carmen Street. They provided the following comments for consideration. <br />• We recommend the applicant to pursue an access easement from the east <br />(commercial parcel). With the intense traffic off of Shoreline Dr the goal would be <br />avoid direct access when we can. If an easement proves not to be a viable option, <br />will need to combine two sites into one shared access. <br />• Location of access would be based on adequate sight distance and maintaining a <br />positive offset for opposing left turns. Driveway needs to have level landing to allow <br />for optimal sight distance