My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2022 City Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2022
>
12-12-2022 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2023 10:41:43 AM
Creation date
1/13/2023 10:41:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> DECEMBER 12,2022 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Penny Saiki,2874 Casco Point Road,noted Matt Johnson purchased the land with the easements,has told <br /> them he is building his own home on the property and renovating the existing house for his parents.This <br /> has all now been confirmed from a third party(the seller).Ms. Saiki noted people buy their homes based <br /> on location and Orono used to be about preserving natural resources.The neighbors invested in the <br /> character of the setting and want to continue to enjoy their privacy.As Ms. Saiki understands from the <br /> seller,she does not want the property to be developed.Ms. Saiki noted the DNR review said no vacation <br /> shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so and noted any vacation may allow <br /> development that would impact conservation of natural resources and habitats. Since this property has <br /> never been developed and has access to public waters,many have wondered why the City has seemingly <br /> ignored the guidance of the Minnesota department charged with management of public natural resources. <br /> Ms. Saiki stated undeveloped land near the lake is becoming scarce and proposed a solution. Since the <br /> City Council and Planning Commission intend to give the land to Mr. Johnson,they need to protect the <br /> rest of Orono as owners of the land and stated"we are all owners as residents of Orono."Ms. Saiki said a <br /> covenant shall be placed on the deed that states that one house can be built on the property,the existing <br /> house would become an ancillary structure(a guesthouse).A covenant attached to the deed means it is on <br /> the land so if ownership changes to a contractor or LLC they are also bound to that one house limit. <br /> Outside the scope of this project,Ms. Saiki said there are 3,100 households in Orono and there is a limit <br /> to how much City structures and services can be financed through taxes.Building more houses to increase <br /> the tax base is one way to increase income,but another way is to better manage expenditures. Cases in <br /> point include district fire services which have been favored for over thirty years. <br /> Printup noted Ms. Saiki must stick to talking about this item. <br /> Ms. Saiki stated they must get public support for big expenditures, and stop giving away public land, <br /> especially to those who need to recuse themselves when it comes to a vote. That in itself is recognition of <br /> conflict of interest. <br /> Henry Brantingham,3185 County Road 6,does not live near the property and has no particular interest. <br /> He is interested in the process and looked at the Planning Commission notes where 14 citizens were at the <br /> meeting or had submitted written comments. The"score"by citizens was 14 to 0 with 100%against.He <br /> read some comments from the minutes of the evening such as"extremely unfair,""not for the benefit of <br /> the citizens of Orono,""I have a hard time wrapping my head around giving away land for free,""the big <br /> question is that none of us knows the intention of Mr. Johnson."Mr.Brantingham finds it interesting that <br /> they are talking about it being one house but the Members are discussing back and forth that perhaps Mr. <br /> Johnson could put in three houses. Other comments include"the plan is incomplete,""MN Statute <br /> 412.853"which is State law, "there is no public benefit,""why are you giving these parcels away,""we <br /> agree with the DNR there does not appear to be public benefit,""far reaching implications highlighted by <br /> the DNR impacting Forest Lake Bay,""I am strongly against vacating that right-of-way."Mr. <br /> Brantingham noted after hearing all of this the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend vacating <br /> these properties and he is shocked. He said perhaps he is naïve and asked if there is anyone in Orono <br /> besides the City Council and the Staff that thinks this is a good idea.He has not heard one person except <br /> them say this is a good thing.He asked if it has occurred to anyone what an incredible ethics problem this <br /> is?It is a sitting Council Member who recused himself and Mr.Brantingham has a concern about the <br /> process. <br /> Page 7 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.