My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 2:21:47 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 1:59:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MS-3131 <br />Jily 13,2005 <br />Page 2 <br />Req. <br />Proposed Lot Data <br />(bold typeface indicates non-conformity with RPUD standards) <br />Lot <br />Proposed Lot 1 (exstg. residence) <br />Proposed Lot 2 (new SFR) <br />Proposed Lot 3 (exstg. Church) <br />Proposed Lot 4 (new SFR) <br />Proposed Lot 5 (new SFR) <br />Proposed Lot 6 (new SFR) <br />Proposed Lot 7 (new SFR) <br />Proposed Lot 8 (new SFR) <br />Proposed Lot 9 (new SFR) <br />Proposed Lot 10 (new SFR) <br />Proposed Lot 11 (new SFR) <br />Proposed Road <br />Dry Area* <br />*38,000 sf <br />15,180 sf <br />208,770 sf <br />14,050 sf <br />14,070 sf <br />17,880 sf <br />15,470 sf <br />14,030 sf <br />14.200 sf <br />15.200 sf <br />14,950 sf <br />31 .100 sf <br />412,900 sf <br />(9.47 acres) <br />Wet Area* Total Area* <br />7,000 sf <br />1,470 sf <br />2,960 sf <br />11,520 sf <br />13,310 sf <br />36,260 sf <br />(0.83 acres) <br />38,000 sf <br />15,180 sf <br />215,770 sf <br />14,050 sf <br />14,070 sf <br />17,880 sf <br />16,940 sf <br />14,030 sf <br />17,160 sf <br />26,720 sf <br />28,260 sf <br />31.100 sf <br />449,160 sf <br />(10.3 acres) <br />Defined; <br />Width Depth <br />200’ 181 ’ <br />Min. <br />Real' <br />Yard <br />74’ 181 ’ <br />460’ 500’ <br />125 ’ <br />90 ’ <br />90 ’ <br />90 ’ <br />170 ’ <br />110 ’ <br />180 ’ <br />130 ’ <br />110 ’ 130 ’ <br />110 ’ 200’w <br />115 ’ 270’w <br />140 ’ 320’w <br />36’ <br />36’ <br />40’ <br />34’ <br />22’ <br />36’ <br />26’ <br />26’ <br />40’w <br />40’w <br />40’w <br />*Tbctc nunbers represent approximate areas after proposed wetland fili and mitigation <br />w: These lot depthsand rear yards are restricted by existing/proposed wetlands or ponds.. <br />Residential Density for RPUD purposes (excl. church): <br />- Incl.Wetland and Road: 10 lots at 233,390 s.f.« 23,339 sfilot = 1 lot/0.S36 ac. = 1.87 units/acre <br />- Incl. Road, Excl. Wetland: 10 lots at 204,130 sf» 20,413 sfi^ot = 1 lot/0.469 ac. = 2.13 units/acre <br />- Excl. Roa^ Excl. Wetland: 10 lots at 173,030 sf» 17,303 s£Hot» 1 lot/0.397 ac. = 2.52 units/acre <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW <br />A. Conformity to Zoning District and Community Management Plan (CMP) <br />The proposed plat is generally in conformity with the 2000-2020 CMP guiding of this area (known <br />as Parcel Group 3: east of Willow, north of Watertown, west of Orono/LL border, south of new Hwy <br />12 corridor) for single family dwellings at a density of 2 to 3 units per acre. However, the CMP <br />currently does not provide guidelines for how a developer might obtain the higher end of this density <br />range. The CMP does not address minimum lot sizes. <br />Tbepropoty has not yet been rezoned to match the CMP guideplan, and is still zoned RR-IB Single <br />Family Rural Residential district, requiring 2.0 dry buildable acres per lot, and a 200' lot width. The <br />proposed subdivision requires a concurrent rezoning. Planning Commission has discussed the <br />concept of allowing individual parcels or groups of parcels to be rezoned rather than the entire <br />leguided area being rezoned (See Exhibits H and K). Rezoning via the Residential Planned Unit <br />Development (RPUD) standards is proposed by staff as the most appropriate existing zoning option <br />for development at the guided density. Other options which might exclude some of the nuances of <br />the RPUD District standards would include creating a new “R-lB-1 ” ‘A-acre zone subdistrict, that
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.