12-12-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

«05-3131 September 15,2005 Page 2 New InformatioD Revised Plan Submitted 9-8-05 . A revised plan was submitted September 9. Staff would note the following items of interest: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. The proposed cul-de-sac public road has been shitted to the northeast to accommodate additional buildable area within Lot 8, which contains a small wetland. Tliis layout leaves the church with a 60 ’ setback to the road, still meeting its minimum 50 ’ setback requirement. The lot adjacent to the Williamson residence has been converted to an 11,230 s.f. (0.26 acre) Outlot ^^ch satisfies about half of the RPUD 10% private recreation area requirement. Wetland mitigation within the Church parcel (now Lot 2) has been eliminated and the plat proposes 1600 s.f. of wetland filling within Lot 8, which requires MCWD approval. Each of the proposed lots includes at least 14,000 s.f. area as reconunended by the Plaiming Commission. Each lot except for Lot 5 has at least the required 90 ’ of width as measured in a straight line at the propos^ 30 ’ front setback line. Lot 5 has approximately 88’. All but Lots 4 and 7 meet the minimum RPUD lot depth requirement of 125 ’. Lots 4 and 7 are restricted due to the dimensions of the site and the location of the cul-de-sac, leaving them subtly short at about 11 5 ’-120 ’ in depth. The wetland in Lot 8 places some significant restrictions on the functional depth of that lot (see preliminary plat drawing). The RPUD minimum rear yard requirement is 40 ’ or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less. Plans propose a 30 ’ rear yard on Lots 3,4,5,6,9 and 10, which appear to substantially meet the requirement, and 35 ’-45 ’ on Lots 7 and 8, ivhere this greater setback allows the potential to retain or establish a buffer in keeping with the Conservation Design goals (more on this below). The 45 ’ rear setback for Lots 7 and 8 pIso reflects the “Manage 2” wetland protection classification established for this wetland in the new Wetland Ordinance, requiring a 25 ’ buffer and a 20 ’ buffer setback (but see below regarding the combined buffer/setback that is osl being met from the wetland extensions in Lots 7,8,9 and 10...). Each lot appears to have a buildable envelope of 75 ’ x 40 ’ or greater as shown on the submitted plat drawing (this may not be tte case when buffer/setback from wetland extensions is accounted for...). Stormwater ponding is proposed within Outlot A adjacent to Willow Drive, and a smaller pond at the rear of Lot 6. i mm J