My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 2:21:47 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 1:59:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f-j <br />4 <br />■? <br />cm OFORONO <br />2750 Kelley Parkway <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Cryital Bay, MN 55323 <br />(952) 249-4600 <br />ZONING FILE: #05-3131 <br />NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />DATE OF NOTICE: October 21,2005 <br />A <br />i TO: Bohland Development, Inc. COPIES:Calvin Presbyterian Church <br />r 1844 Wayzata Blvd.201 Glendale Drive <br />P.O. Box 815 Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />f Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />•r Keith & Vicky Williamson <br />190 Willow Drive North <br />• <br />.* <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />’■V^' <br />T\TE OF APPLICATION: Preliminary Plat / PUD Development <br />:Si <br />•i-DATE OF MEETING: October 17,2005 <br />Planning Commission recommended as follows: <br />Table, to allow the applicant to address a number of remaining issues, including: <br />1) Provide staff and City consultants the opportunity to review the landscaping plan provided at <br />the meeting. It was noted that due to the high visibility of this site, initial plantings of <br />screening trees should be in the 14 ’ height range at the time of planting. <br />The Paric Commission should review the proposed trail connection through the Church <br />property to Glendale Drive, and make a recommendation as to whether it is appropriate that <br />such connection be public. Planning Commission noted that they have genei^Iy been <br />considering the proposed road as private, and that adding a public trail within the private <br />development may cause conflicts... Park Commission should also recommend whether or <br />how much of the public trail along Willow Drive should be constructed by the developer. <br />The City normally re-imburses the developer for public trails that are constructed by the <br />developer, but not merely for the public trail easements that are reserved for future trail <br />construction by the City. <br />PC also indicated that the combination of Outlot B and the proposed trail connection to <br />Glendale would satisfy the RPUD ”10% private recreation area” requirement, with no park <br />fee re-imbursement for either of these private elements.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.