My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 2:21:47 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 1:59:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i ^ <br />i ' <br />i <br />»i <br />! <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Momlay, October 17,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p m. <br />(005-3152 Bohlaod Devdopment, Coatinacd) <br />Oronberg stated they wtmld attempt to preserve as many trees as possible. Gronberg stated if the road <br />were moved, it would likely result in the removal of even more trees. <br />There were no further public comments. <br />J^ritzler inquired bow diis development diflers from Luce Line Ridge. <br />Oaffron stated in that development the lots were approximately three acres in a five-acre zone. Gaffron <br />indicated at diat time diere tvas no attempt to do any buffering of the views. Gaffron stated if the house <br />lots could be moved up furdier, diat might be another option to help reduce the visual impact of the <br />development. <br />Oronberg stated in his opinion the lots might be getting too small to construct a reasonably sized house <br />and that he would prefer the lot sizes not be reduced any further. <br />Leslie indicated he would be inclined to keep the 30-foot setback. Leslie inquired whether Lot 3 has any <br />covenants or restrictions on clearing the trees behind that house. <br />Oronberg stated in his opinion there should be a covenant or a conservation easement for Lot 3 to prevent <br />cutting of ttioae trees. <br />Kempf stated the clustering idea is a rather gray area, but when you weigh the view versus the amount of <br />room, the developer should avoid the feeling of the bouses being crowded. <br />Rahn concurred that the setback should be kept at 30 feet. <br />Bremer stated ttw property owners would not need to build up to their sefr>ack. Bremer stated she <br />personally likes die idea of pushing the lots up a little bit and that she would like to see the trees <m Lot 3 <br />remain. <br />Leslie inquired whether the cul-de-sac could be located more at the intersection of Lots 1 and 2 and <br />whedier diat would help push the lots up further. <br />Oronberg indicated diat is just a tenqiorary cul-de-sac. <br />Rahn concurred the Council should review this qiplicadon to see whether they would be agreeable to this <br />type of clustering concept <br />Leslie stated he would like to see the Council support this application since it helps to preserve the rural <br />ouis feel and still provide sufficient lot sizes. <br />Oronberg sbited in Us view the development will not be very visible from Watertown Road. <br />PAGE 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.