Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />![ <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 21,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Gatlron suggested the Park Commission review this application again to obtain th.. iccommendations on <br />who would construct the trail and maintain it. GafTron stated if that wetland area near the trail is <br />considered incidental, it would not be an issue. <br />Jurgens stated in his opinion the City should not be purchasing any land or easement for this trail and <br />should not construct the trail. Jurgens stated he does feel, however, that the City should maintain the trail <br />if it is dedicated for public use. <br />Bohl stated in his view it would be fair that he be given credit for the land and the cost of the trail. <br />Rahn opened the public hearing. <br />* <br />There were no public comments concerning this application. <br />Rahn closed the public hearing. <br />Rahn stated he is comfortable with this application, especially since the applicant is receptive to all the <br />recommendations. <br />Kempf indicated he is very pleased with the revisions made by the applicant and the steps he has taken to <br />be ecological conscious. <br />Bremer moved, Jurgens seconded, to recommend approval of Application #05-3131, Steve Bohl of <br />Ihj i Bohland Development, Inc., 190 Willow Drive North, and 177 Glendale Drive, granting preliminary <br />plat and general concept plan approval, subject to the following conditions: One, the Park <br />Commission recommendations are followed with respect to trail easement and trail construction; <br />two, the applicant agrees to fulfill all the recommendations outlined in the AES letter; three, <br />submittal of a landscape plan Incorporating the recommendations of the AES and the Park <br />Commission; four, submittal of written confirmation of the approval from the MCWD, with the <br />understanding that if approval is not received from the Watershed Dbtrict, the application would <br />need to reappear before the Planning Commission. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />PAGE 5 <br />ifi rttmia