Laserfiche WebLink
•, i <br />k- • <br />1 <br />A <br />MINITTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(FARK COMMISSION COMMENTS, Conttnued) <br />Den Chillstrom, Long Lake Planning Conunission and Park Board, indicated they would like to get <br />together with (Bono’s Park Commission in the near future to discuss trails. <br />Murphy recommended the responsibilities associated with a dog park be well defined in order to insure <br />that the park is properly maintained. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - David Rahn, Representative <br />Rahn stated he had nothing to report but would remain for questions. <br />PUBUC COl I :nts <br />None <br />ZONING Al I IwISTRATOR’S REPORT <br />3. M5-3141 JEFFREY AND ETHEL GUSTAFSON, 4203 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE > RESOLUTION NO. 5376 <br />Jeffrey Oustafton, Applicant, was present. <br />Gtffron stated the applicant is requesting a lot width variance for a property that has 90 feet at the <br />shoreline and 117 feet at the 7S>foot setback where 140 feet is normally required. In addition, the <br />applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit for 770 cubic yar<k of fill in order to construct a new <br />single-family residoicc on the property. The property is located within the one-acre district and consists <br />for l.OS <br />The Planning Commission voted S-1-1 to recommend approval of the application, with the dissenting <br />Conmussioner feeling that the amount of grading/fill being proposed was unreasonable. Gaffron noted <br />since the review by the Planning Commission, the applicant has added an additional 2S0 square feet of <br />structure. Gaffion noted structural coverage and hardcover are not issues on this property. <br />Gaffron stated Staff and the City Engineer have discussed the amount of fill necessary in the area of the <br />new garage and driveway apron. Gaffron indicated the plans show a finished slope along the east side of <br />the driveway that drains directly east toward the existing shared loop dnveway. This loop will disappear <br />according to the Applicant’s plans and the applicant is now proposing a drainage swale to be directed <br />toward the lake rath^ than the neighboring property. Gaffron noted those calculations have not been <br />provided to Staff to insure that the neighboring property will not receive any runoff. <br />Gaffron recommended the application he approved contingent upon approval by the City Engineer or <br />tabled. <br />White inquired what the time frame is for construction of the new residence. <br />Gustafson stated they would like to demolish the existing house October 1" and build a model home for <br />the Luxury Home Tour. Gustafson requested approval of the application subject to approval by the City <br />Engineer. <br />PAGE 2 <br />f <br />BfelU