Laserfiche WebLink
wHhin the 7S*-250* zone and an addition of a tum-around apron within the 2S0 ’-500* zone. The <br />vote was 4 in fiwor, 2 against, with one abstain. The dissenting Commissioners felt the lot should <br />conform to 25% widiin the 7S*-2S0’ zone as it is a rebuild. <br />Staff Reeommcadation <br />Staff leoommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. The lot is somev^at <br />long and narrow with many of the lots in the neighborhood having received hardcover variances. <br />The 27.2% recommen dation for the 7S’-2S0 ’ zone was based on a compilation of all rebuild <br />applications in the past S years on similar lot conditions and the hardcover percentages that were <br />anoroved. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Adopt foe attached Resolution granting lot area, lot width, 7S*«250’ and 2S0*-S00 ’ zone hardcover <br />variances fiM* 774 Tonkawa Road. <br />n§m <br />* -