11-14-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

f; li ' ^ 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 24,2005 - 7:00 o ’clock p.m. *«. M5-3153 CITY OF ORONO, AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1577: EXTERIOR STORAGE - ORDINANCE NO. 29,3'^ SERIES Mnrphy moved. Acting Mayor Sanicvcre seconded, adopting ORDINANCE NO. 29, 3'^ SERIES an Ordinance Amendment to Section 78-1577, Exterior Storage. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *9. #05-3156 SONYA GARNETT ON BEHALF OF KEVIN GARNETT, 450 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 5396 Mnrphy asoved. Acting Mayor Sansevere seconded adopting Resolution No. 5396, granting a Conditional Use Permit to permit installation of pinmbing, consisting of a bathroom allowing for a toilet, tab or shower and sink, in the existing barn located oa the Dickenson Street side of the property located at 450 Orono Orchard Road Sonth. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *10. #05-3157 MARTHA T. MASON ON BEHALF OF SARA MOOS, 2160 WEBBER HILLS ROAD - VARIANCE Mnrphy moved. Acting Mayor Sansevere seconded, approving the front yard setback variance for the home additions, however, denial of the fh>nt yard setback variance for the pergola, for the residence at 2160 Webber Hills Road. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. 11. #05-3160 JUDSON M. DAYTON, 825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT Gaffiron stated that the applicant proposes to combine and re-arrange the lot lines among three existing tax parcels to result in just two parcels. The 21-acre parcel contains an existing residence structure, guest house, bam and various outbuildings. The easterly of the existing smaller parcels contains a cabin; the westerly of the smaller parcels contains a variety of small outbuildings near the lakeshore. The intent is to 1) combine the two smaller parcels into one S-acre building site; 2) then rearrange the lot line between this combination and the 21-acre parcel to straighten out the common lot line; and 3) formalize a driveway easement through the 21-acre parcel out to Old Crystal Bay Road to serve the S-acre parcel. With regard to the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the rearrangement, Gaffron pointed out that they recommended the application not be subject to platting, and should not be subject to park fees or stormwater and drainage trunk fees, both of which would be appropriate only if the property is further subdivided in the future. Attorney Barrett questioned whether the City might wish to have an interest in the 30’ driveway easement to avoid any future problems between property owners. In this case, the Council might recommend takmg the 30* easement in order to create a public road at some point if necessar>'. Murphy asked whether the planning staff u'commendatior differed from that of the Planning Comnussion. Bremer posed the question of what might happen if the 21-acre parcel cuirently for sale is further subdivided. PAGE 6 of 13 . i