Laserfiche WebLink
#05-3160 <br />October 20,2005 <br />Pigt2 <br />Discussion <br />PLEASE REVIEW THE MEMO AND EXHIBITS OF OCTOBER 12. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />Planning Commission reviewed this on October 17 and concluded that the lot line <br />rearrangement resulted in little change from the current conditions. Planning Commission <br />recommended approval of the lot line reairangement and creation of driveway easement as <br />presented; and that this application should not be subject to platting, and should not be <br />subject to park fees or stormwater & drainage trunk fee, both of which would be <br />appropriate only if the property is further subdivided in the future. <br />Planning Commission did not specifically address whether the existing accessory structures <br />in the 0-75’ zone should be relocated or removed, but did note that the mere easement <br />creation would not result in making the existing horse bam more nonconforming as to side <br />setback, since the zoning code does not specify a setback from driveway easements. <br />) Staff Recommendation <br />If Council reaches the same conclusions as Planning Commission, direct staff to draft a <br />resolution for approval for adoption on November 14. The City Attorney may wish to <br />comment on the plat waiver statutes. <br />/t*. ' ;.#r ‘ <br />♦ ; -1 ? V. ■ . V <br />■r <br />t*V". ■ ' i' ii‘ ■ ‘.t <br />■ •: A,-l' ■ i. 'W.rc <br />V » W * >• V <br />* ,T <br />V <br />• V <br />. ---- ^ .