My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
10-24-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 1:14:36 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 12:46:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO €TTY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 10,2005 <br />7:00 o*clock pjn. <br />(Hennepin Connty Regional Railroad Anthority, Continned) <br />Wilda stated sheds would be considered an exclusive use and would be encompassed under a lease and <br />that gardens would probably fall under a landscape permit. Wilda stated she does not at this time know if <br />those policies will be adopt^. <br />Mayor Peterson inquired whether the residents along the trail would be given notice of the public hearing <br />to he scheduled later this year. <br />Wilda stated notice of the public meeting would be given to each of the individual cities with a request <br />that the residents be notifi^ of the meeting. <br />Linda Koblick, Hennepin County Commissioner, stated Hennepin County is interested in preserving these <br />corridors for future transportation and duit HCRRA's policies need to be updated Koblick stated they do <br />work with the cities to enforce violations and that they are interested in adopting policies that will work <br />for most properties. Koblick stated the public hearing will likely be held at the end of the year and a vote <br />will be tndcen on the policy once it is developed. Koblick stated they would like to get the input of tlw <br />public on what the policy should be relating to acceptable uses. <br />Murphy noted the City Council has a resolution supporting the Railroad Authority and the HCRRA <br />maintaining autfiority over the corridor. Mui|ri)y stated to his experience right-of-way is a legal term that <br />is bound in law and that leases and easements need to be entered into if there is any encroachment with <br />that right-of-way. Murphy noted the Luce Line is located cxi Excel’s land, which does give the city <br />precedence. <br />Muiphy stated it is important for the Railroad Authority to be able to control this right-of-way, noting that <br />if this corridor is not preserved, it will not be available in the future. Murphy stated the City has to guard <br />against that corridor ^sappearing and that in his opinion the Railroad AuAority is being prudent in its <br />planning. <br />Mayor Peterson read the proposed Resolution. <br />White moved, MeMUIan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5386, a Resolution regarding the <br />nse of the Dakota Rail Corridor. VOTE: AyesS,Nays0. <br />Peterson stated the residents would be notified of the public hearing. <br />Sansevere inquired what die average width of lots are along this corridor. <br />A resident indicated diey range between 50 to 75 feet. <br />Gabriel Jahbour requested the residents be told an average price that they could be charged for an <br />agreement <br />PAGES <br />T
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.