Laserfiche WebLink
k <br />Dale Applicatioa Received: OS-lS-05 <br />Date Applicatioa Complete: 07-07-05 <br />60-Day Review Period Expiration: 09-07-05 <br />60-Day Extension Expiration: 11-07-05 <br />COUNCIL MEETING <br />OCT 24200b <br />CITYOFORONO <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: September 27,2005 <br />Item No. <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Melanie Curtis <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Title: City Planner <br />Item Description: <br />#05-3124 - E)r. William & Rhonda Omiie - 1860 Shadywood Rd - Variances - Denial Resolution <br />Zoning District: LR-IC, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 0.5 acrc/100* <br />Lot Area: 0.89 acre (38,796 s.f.) <br />Lot Width: 135* <br />Lift of Exhibits: <br />Exhibit A - Denial Resolution <br />Exhibit B - Letter to Applicants <br />Exhibit C - PC Action Notice dated 07-20-05 <br />Exhibit D - PC Memo & Exhibits of 07-07-05 <br />Application Summary: <br />The applicants are requesting a rear yard setback variance in order to raise the roof of the existing <br />detach^ garage to match that of the house. <br />In order to do so the following variances are requested: <br />1. A 75 ’ - 250 ’ hardcover variance for 29.5% where 26% was approved in a 1993 variance <br />approval; and <br />2. a hardcover variance within the 250 ’ - 500 ’ zone to allow 37.2% hardcover where 30% is <br />normally allowed and 37.2% currently exist; and <br />3. A rear yard street setback of 3.0 ’ where 10 ’ is normally required and 3.0 ’ currently exists. <br />Plnnning Staff Recommendation <br />At the Planning Commission meeting in July staff recommended approval of the rear yard setback <br />variance for the garage roof; subject to the removal of excess hardcover to revert back to the levels <br />previously approved in 1993. <br />The applicants have not provided a revised survey or plans to reflect hardcover removals. Further the <br />applicants have not returned phone calls nor responded to letters from staff regarding Council review <br />of the application. Therefore, as the 60-day extension will expire on November 7,2005, and no <br />extension request or revised plans have been received by the City, Planning Staff recommends denial <br />of the variances as requested per the attached Resolution. <br />— -------