Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Moaday, October 10,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(M054121 Narrow! SalooB, Coatiaaed) <br />Murphy stated the point that he is trying to make is that the applicant should take into consideration that <br />he is building on one of the most pristine pieces of land in the Midwest and recommended that a qualified <br />architect be consulted. <br />Curtis noted an extension in writing would need to be submitted by the applicant. <br />PeCersoa aaived, Saasevere sccoaded, to refer AppUcattoa #05>313d, Troy Broitzmaa, I860 <br />ShoreHae Drive, back to the naaaiagCoaunissioa. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />0. #05-3149 TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH, 2060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH- <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />Petersoa amved, Marpky secoaded, to table AppHcatioo #05-3149, Trinity Lutheran Church, <br />2060 Sixth Avenae North, at the reqnest of the apfdicaat, to the November 14,2005 City Council <br />mcetlai. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*9. #05^151 GARY AND SANDRA BARON, 3619 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5389 <br />Murphy nwved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5389, a Rcsolatioa granting lot <br />width, hat area, lake setback, and hardcover variances for the property located at 3619 North Shore <br />Drive. VOTE: Ayes5,NaysO. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />White stated in his view it is inappropriate for the Park Commissioner to lecture the Council on how inept <br />the Piatuiing Commission is. White stated in his opinion the Planning Commission is going a good job. <br />Murphy commented that also happened two weeks ago with another Park Commissioner. <br />'McMillan noted that commissioner was commenting on a specific application. McMillan stated she <br />would be willing to call the Commissioner and discuss the situation. <br />White stated he has been infonned that it costs die City of Minneapolis S30,000 for each dog park. <br />Sansevere conunented the Planning Commission in his view does a marvelous job and that it is unusual <br />that the Council differs from the recommendatitm of the Planning Commission. <br />PAGE 24 <br />. T