My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 12:30:30 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 11:55:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THF <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 19,2005 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Thiesse stated Orono does have other NURP ponds and thnt they are not fenced, even when they are <br />located near elementaiy schools and preschools. T'.*esse stated he would prefer a dry pond and that he <br />would like to discuss this further with the City Engineer. <br />Thies.se also stated the City’s parking requirements add nine more feet to tlie parking lot Thiesse stated <br />he could look at some slanted parking, but that the City Engineer has recommended expanding the <br />parking lot by nine feet. <br />Gafiron stated the City's code does not specifically say a 24-foot driving lane, but that is typically <br />required by the City to accommodate some of the larger vehicles. <br />Rahn stated he does not have any issues with the application. <br />Bremer moved, Fritticr seconded, to recommend approval of Application 1105-3149, Trinity <br />Lntberan Church, 2060 Sixth Avenue, granting of a conditional use permit to allc w construction of <br />additions to the church and also to allow repaving, reorientation and enlargement of the existing <br />parking lot, subject to City Engineer approval of the parking lot prior to the City Council meeting, <br />and fhrthcr subject to City Engineer approval of the pond and verification of whether a NURP <br />pond is still required. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1, Jurgens opposed. <br />9. . «05-31S9 TIM POWERS ON BEHALF OF KEVIN GRELL, 1945 FA^RN^^ POINT <br />ROAD, VARIANCE, 10:01 P.M. ~ 10:09 P.M. <br />Tim Powers, Appiidmt,^^^ present. <br />Gundlac^ itated the applicanf’is r^uesting the foUpwing variances t:. order to replace a deck on the west <br />• *•side of the home with a smaller deck: <br />1. A rear yard setback variance to permit a rear yard setback of 13.6 feet where 30 feet is <br />normally r^utred and 13.6 feet currently exists. \ <br />2. A Jiafdcover variance to permit 26.3 percent hardcover within the 75’-250’ zone where <br />inmiiiMiii <br />PAGEM s'
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.