10-10-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i 1 ■? .r" vr MINUTES OF TUB OEONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MtnSay, Sum IM, 2tOS 4:M o’clock |MII«%s- 5. Front yard building tdbock virianco to pormii • (hwii yard •etbock of f * when 35* it nofimlly coquMaad l6*cuainUy oxiEiioollewcoiiilnictionorovaiibule. Tho Wjtibiile addition would cncfoack 45* omo tha ajdawalk riaamawt and havo a 0* wtback from the .lighway caacment). 6. Front and rear yard vartaacf<« would ba required at a front ^*r J of 20* it normally required and an unobatnictcd rear prd of 30* ta normally required where propoaed weatibule and pltnler boaet would encroock on theae yard raquiretnciUi Oaffton ataled the apptlttiitt arc pfopoting to ednetnict a 13* by 16* kitcHen addUion to the northcaat comar of the buUdUif. THecaaiaraaidalollineraquIriaa IS-lboiaelback wh^ciheeuUmgbuiUinf and the ptopoaad addition am only U IkI Horn tha lot line. Tha kilciicn addition would ba tolely located on the applicant*! property where it wouki not encroach on any of tlie many eatements currently reatricling the property in aome way. The property t laittt of acrea or 13,656 aquare feet where a minimum lot aioB orapproximololy 20JOOO aquore fhai if niquiivd. Oallioooolodthtiia an tailing lot of record and lot area ti not an itaue. OafYWm lUlod hardcover on the ^ile it virtually 100 percen t anil would normally be allowed 35 pcfcant GoRVon Bated die appliconit am not propoaiog any change to the hardcover eacopt for poaiibly ineorporating aoma amall giaon araaa in tha Afom. The applicanu arc propoaing incrcoaing the itnictural coverage on thii lot ftom 35 percent to 38 percent. OafTron gated a kitchen addition at this location would reduea the eaiatiiig 25.5 loot walMo-wall •cpamioabelmienihoeocntracrvicomatiooaodtlieNarrowtbuilduigtojuituiider2l Ibet, adding to a more congotcU iiluaticn both vitually and fhiro a IrafTic imndpoifit The aceem driveway eammeot conidor iato the City paikiog lot at this locatkm it IS feet wide, wtthin 0.7* of tha extating Narrmvt building and within four feet of the mivicc station. Given that the acccu driveway hat a bend in it just north of the Narmwt huiMiog. further reatrietioM by a kitchen txpo naioo in this aio would be itupproprielc. One option to consider would bo lo offset the kitchen addition at least five fed wegward ■long iNe^^eth tide of the buildtog to llml dm vituil and funciimal comiricllone are miniinizcd and Ihu titmi bet jlrecn the Nnrrowt and the mrvice eieiion duet not decrenm. I’AGkSI ,v 'r---. X.. . .:v MINIH ESOK THF. ORONO PLANNING COhfMlSSION MEETING Monday, June 20.2005 6:00 o'clock r m. # Suff findt that a tide miback variance to allow the kitchen addition is proposed would not be ’ appigprialtt. A tide leibick variincc of about two feet die northeatteriy comer of an offset rectangular kitchen addition would maintaio the existing level of separation between the Harrows and the service station. In addition, the applicatU ts proposing a vestibule entrance approximately 7* by 13.5* at the front of the building along Shoreline Drive. The proposed vestibule would allow for a doub’e door system at tlie ftool entrance in an effort to contain interior noise. TTc vestibule addition shows six dooa; a double set of enlxmace andlpj^ two single doors opening to each side of the proposed outdoor seating. The i^l inning vandards require a front yard of 20 feet depth and a building serback of^5/cei from the from Im line The exisimg building is located 16 5 feel from the iront lot line, and therefore already encroachri oiv both the * ml yaid and building setback mmimuim. The proposed vestihufe ivould f loinide an n.'dUioinJ St. .en feet atrcct'Ward. requiring variance approval. AddinoosUy, the vetiihbie would be a permanent ohtiniction encroaching five foci into die Gty*s lidfwalk easement. Gaflnm stated the off-iueet parking requncnieni is appioximaidy 80 stalls, which is based on lU of (he outside anting and inside snting. The businesses existing on the nortli side of Shoreline Drive west of Shadywood Road. Iisve historicaity shared the City*owned parking lot located to the rear of all the hufinesam. This le out ofnecessityaaliiiiilcdofi-tKertparkinfexiirsnIoiifShorctuw Drive CcfT;ciadicaia^ lo *964, the Navarre municipal paiking lot was acquirad and improv ed - The busineasrs ihst back up to (he parking lot were origMially asaeaaed for the imptovemcn a to it tmed on dw.r r iouat M fo>fU4ge on a traveled street. The Nanows sue was assessed for i04 5 feet ot frontage o* e*ght percent ,«/ Ike total fnaitage assessed At the time of asaeismenl. no coramiiments were made (hat woiikt api'n.tion apccific aumbats of parking atails to specific propemet GafTiun slated wuhout detailed floor pUns ol al! o in ing buamams, City staff cannot cakulau w.*i, any accufscy how nwch pariiqg U lecluiicalfy required by Cny Code fur ail the busintsics ha\ aig rights *o the lot. fac;* 31